IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2018
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2018.8517804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic Aperture Radar Ship Detection Using Capsule Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] Ship size, sea condition, accuracy, cost [37] Gradient explosion, robustness, speed, detection accuracy [22] Ship detection, efficiency, robustness, sea-land segmentation [38] Deep learning features, ship target, detection performance [26] Detection accuracy, false alarm rate, performance, position [39] Verification accuracy, testing accuracy, ship classification, false alarm [27] Detection rate, speed, detection accuracy, ship's target [40] Ship detection, ship size, performance, robustness [28] Real-time observation, rescue, detection accuracy, faster [41] Scene classification, ship detection, accuracy, efficiency [29] Missed detections, accuracy, densely arranged ships, scale sensitivity [42] Mean average precision, accuracy, dataset, performance [30] Multi-scene detection, false alarm, performance [43] Small targets, computational efficiency, detection performance, ship management [31] Training speed, accuracy, performance, ship detection [44] Extraction and classification of candidate regions, robustness, adaptability [32] Speed, accuracy, performance, ship detection, cost [45] Ship detection, image recognition, automatic, time [33] Lost ships, open-source, fast, cost [46] Small ships, computational efficiency, pixels, precision, classification [34] Accuracy, ship detection, mean average precision, unique [64] Processing speed, accuracy, object detection, unique [35] Detection, segmentation, accuracy, pixel level [65] Object detectors, land-ocean segmentation, performance [36] Automatic, accuracy, speed, loss function…”
Section: Features Citations Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[21] Ship size, sea condition, accuracy, cost [37] Gradient explosion, robustness, speed, detection accuracy [22] Ship detection, efficiency, robustness, sea-land segmentation [38] Deep learning features, ship target, detection performance [26] Detection accuracy, false alarm rate, performance, position [39] Verification accuracy, testing accuracy, ship classification, false alarm [27] Detection rate, speed, detection accuracy, ship's target [40] Ship detection, ship size, performance, robustness [28] Real-time observation, rescue, detection accuracy, faster [41] Scene classification, ship detection, accuracy, efficiency [29] Missed detections, accuracy, densely arranged ships, scale sensitivity [42] Mean average precision, accuracy, dataset, performance [30] Multi-scene detection, false alarm, performance [43] Small targets, computational efficiency, detection performance, ship management [31] Training speed, accuracy, performance, ship detection [44] Extraction and classification of candidate regions, robustness, adaptability [32] Speed, accuracy, performance, ship detection, cost [45] Ship detection, image recognition, automatic, time [33] Lost ships, open-source, fast, cost [46] Small ships, computational efficiency, pixels, precision, classification [34] Accuracy, ship detection, mean average precision, unique [64] Processing speed, accuracy, object detection, unique [35] Detection, segmentation, accuracy, pixel level [65] Object detectors, land-ocean segmentation, performance [36] Automatic, accuracy, speed, loss function…”
Section: Features Citations Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After testing and comparing it with other ML-based ship detection systems, it was proved that it enhances the accuracy of ship detection by 91.03% along with a false alarm rate of 9.5745 × 10 −9 . The performance can be further enhanced with fewer samples [26]. Wang et al [27] have conducted a study for the detection of the ship very efficiently and effectively by the employment of the enhanced YOLOv3 procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its accuracy reached 98.14% in the tests of 10 kinds of MSTAR database. Schwegmann et al [39] applied CapsNet in the SAR ship detection task, which stimulated its ability to detect smaller adjacent ships. Comer et al [40] proposed a principal CapsNet (PCN) architecture for SAR image classification in the context of self-service learning (S 3 L).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiao et al [30] detected multi-scale and multi-scene ship targets using densely connected network as backbone and introduced focal loss to faster RCNN structure. More recently, Wang et al [34] used RetinaNet [35] and Schwegmann et al [36] introduced Capsule Network to SAR ship detection. As most of these methods relied on the pretrained models on natural datasets to finetune the parameters of their models, Deng et al [37] designed a new detector using condensed backbone network and feature reuse strategy, which can be trained from scratch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%