1993
DOI: 10.1109/83.210867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic aperture pulse-echo imaging with rectangular boundary arrays (acoustic imaging)

Abstract: The effectiveness of a square boundary array in finite-range, pulse-echo imaging is investigated. The images produced by such an array are quite poor when no additional signal processing is used. It is demonstrated through simulations that a synthetic-aperture signal processing technique called image addition can be used to reduce the sidelobes associated with the square boundary array, thereby improving the image quality. Image addition was originally proposed for narrowband imaging of far-field scenes, but i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nikolov et al [30] introduced recursive ultrasound imaging as a method for increasing frame rate. Synthesizing an effective aperture for 3-D imaging using 2-D transducer arrays using only the outermost elements was described in [31]. The use of coded excitation is a current area of study that has benefits of improved frame rates, increased SNR, and improved depth penetration [32]- [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikolov et al [30] introduced recursive ultrasound imaging as a method for increasing frame rate. Synthesizing an effective aperture for 3-D imaging using 2-D transducer arrays using only the outermost elements was described in [31]. The use of coded excitation is a current area of study that has benefits of improved frame rates, increased SNR, and improved depth penetration [32]- [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, (L + 1)/2 } ( · is the floor operator) that i) has an integer-valued pair N 2 = (L − N 1 + 1)/( N 1 + 1) ∈ N and ii) is closest to the ideal N * 1 computed using Eq. (14). If no such parameter is found, then a solution for aperture L does not exist.…”
Section: General Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, optimal sparse linear arrays with spatially separated transmitting and receiving elements may be generated by simple interpolation [13]. Furthermore, it has been shown that placing elements on the convex boundary of an active planar array is effectively equivalent to filling the interior of the array with virtual elements [12], [14]. Although planar arrays are of considerable practical interest due to their capability of beamforming in both the azimuthal and elevational directions, linear arrays also have value in many applications, as well as in developing array processing methods and theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of Methods I and 11: Because A (RT, 0,) and the width of triangles generated by the same point target are identical in these two methods, the first term in (44) is the same in Methods I and 11. From (9) and (17), …”
Section: Parameters Of F ( R ) Useful For the Comparison F ( T ) Hmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The meaning of these conditions (and conditions derived below) will be discussed in Section II,F, which shows that it is not difficult to satisfy these conditions. Next, we compare the first term in (44). From (16) and (23), the variance U: (RT, 8,) (62) becomes (54); therefore, the condition for u~,,,, < us,Iv is the same as that for us,II < us,I.…”
Section: Parameters Of F ( R ) Useful For the Comparison F ( T ) Hmentioning
confidence: 96%