2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesized computational aesthetic evaluation of photos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors, such as Datta et al [3], Wang et al [4], Ke et al [5], and Luo et al [6], conducted studies aimed at automated aesthetic classification using a number of technical characteristics such as lightness, saturation, Rule of Thirds, etc. For these experiments, sets of large-format photographs from websites and the evaluations made by the users of such sites were used.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors, such as Datta et al [3], Wang et al [4], Ke et al [5], and Luo et al [6], conducted studies aimed at automated aesthetic classification using a number of technical characteristics such as lightness, saturation, Rule of Thirds, etc. For these experiments, sets of large-format photographs from websites and the evaluations made by the users of such sites were used.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some datasets that have been used in several times for the images classification. Among them, Photo.net [3][4][5], DPChallenge.com [6,7] and the one created by Cela-Conde et al [8][9][10] However, when its generalization capacity is studied, it has been detected that they cannot be considered as representative for the realization of image experiments. In some cases, the correlation is greater when the validation set belongs to the same data source as the training set, and this correlation drops markedly when the validation source set is different from that of the training.…”
Section: Limitations Found In the Datasets Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the six models mentioned above, some types of machine-learning models, such as deep learning, artificial neural network, and support vector machine, have been used for photograph aesthetical evaluation and prediction [ 57 62 ] Although the machine-learning models are black boxes, they are more convenient for model building because of their availability and generality with the development during the last decades. Nearly, all software programs for machine learning, such as MATLAB, Weka, and Enterprise Miner, provide neural network toolbox.…”
Section: Models Of Aesthetic Appreciationmentioning
confidence: 99%