2005
DOI: 10.1021/ic048221j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Structure, and Electrochemical Properties of Copper(I) Complexes with S/N Homoscorpionate and Heteroscorpionate Ligands

Abstract: Dinuclear Cu(I) complexes with bifunctionalized homoscorpionate ligands, hydrotris(thioxotriazolyl)borato [Li(Tr(Me,o)(-)(Py)) (1) and Li(Tr(Mes,Me)) (2)], and the heteroscorpionate ligand hydro[bis(thioxotriazolyl)-3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazolyl]borato [K(Br(Mes)pz(o)(-)(Py))] (3) were synthesized and crystallographically characterized. The complexes [Cu(Tr(Mes,Me))](2) (4) and [Cu(Tr(Me,o)(-)(Py))](2) (5) exhibit a similar coordination geometry where every metal is surrounded by three thioxo groups in a trigonal arr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(63 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broad singlets are found in the 1 H NMR spectrum of 1 at 5.14 ppm and in that of 2 at 5.47 ppm, corresponding to the B–H hydrogen atoms, which are shifted to significantly lower field relative to the ligand. The higher electronegativity of Cu relative to Na causes more deshielded protons on the coordinated ligands for Cu and thus downfield shifted resonances in accordance with the literature 11l,13b13d. The equivalence of the resonances of the two mim substituents is surprising in view of the solid‐state structure determined by X‐ray crystallography (vide infra), which revealed that one of the two mim ligands is coordinated to the copper ion, whereas the other one remains dangling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Broad singlets are found in the 1 H NMR spectrum of 1 at 5.14 ppm and in that of 2 at 5.47 ppm, corresponding to the B–H hydrogen atoms, which are shifted to significantly lower field relative to the ligand. The higher electronegativity of Cu relative to Na causes more deshielded protons on the coordinated ligands for Cu and thus downfield shifted resonances in accordance with the literature 11l,13b13d. The equivalence of the resonances of the two mim substituents is surprising in view of the solid‐state structure determined by X‐ray crystallography (vide infra), which revealed that one of the two mim ligands is coordinated to the copper ion, whereas the other one remains dangling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The sulfur copper sulfur angles are deviating significantly, ranging from 114.76(1) to 123.96(1)°for S1−Cu1−S2 and S1−Cu1−S3′, respectively. This distortion can also be found in related dimeric copper compounds in the literature, where the copper center is surrounded by three sulfurs in an almost trigonal fashion exhibiting sulfur copper sulfur angles between 105.20(4) and 134.98 (4) 17 The hydrogen copper bond is almost perpendicular to the CuS 3 plane, which is confirmed by the hydrogen copper sulfur angles of 84.4(1)°for H1−Cu1−S1 and 107.9(6)°for H1−Cu1−S3′. The nitrogen boron nitrogen bonds vary between 106.3(1) and 110.8(1)°for N12−B1−N22 and N12−B1−N32, respectively, exhibiting a distorted tetrahedral geometry at the boron.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…)°for [Cu{Tr Me,o-Py }] 2 17. The deviation from the ideal trigonal geometry toward the tetrahedral one can be explained by the 3-center-2-electron B−H···Cu interaction, which is evidenced by a H−Cu distance of 1.92(2) Å.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, different groups have used alternative nomenclatures and thus there is considerable scope for confusion. For instance, the abbreviation Tt was first used by Riordan for his tris(methylthioalkyl)borates,7 but has subsequently been used by Vahrenkamp for these ligands16 and initially by Marchio et al for his 1,3,4‐triazole‐2‐thione based borate ligands,27a although this was later changed for Tr to avoid confusion 27b27e. There is undoubted logic for both of these assignments, but the duplication leads to potential confusion.…”
Section: Ligand Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%