2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0mt00062k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structure and biological evaluation of bis salicylaldehyde-4(N)-ethylthiosemicarbazone ruthenium(iii) triphenylphosphine

Abstract: Bis salicylaldehyde-4(N)-ethylthiosemicarbazone ruthenium(iii) triphenylphosphine [Ru(Sal-etsc)(H-Sal-etsc)(PPh(3))] was synthesized and structurally characterized by spectral and X-ray crystallographic studies and it showed 100% inhibition on the DPPH radical. It also exhibited a significant lymphocyte activity and inhibitory effect on the lung carcinoma A549 cell.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sharp band that appeared at 783–818 cm −1 in the ligands corresponding to ν C=S vibration was appeared at 771–883 cm −1 in the complexes confirmed the binding of thione sulphur atom to the ruthenium 53 . Vibrations corresponding to phenolic OH (ν OH ) was found at 3439–3457 cm −1 in the ligands shifted slightly lower region at 3427–3454 cm −1 in complexes ( 1–4 ), indicating the nonparticipation of the phenolic oxygen atom in coordination 54 . The electronic spectra of the complexes ( 1–4 ) (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A sharp band that appeared at 783–818 cm −1 in the ligands corresponding to ν C=S vibration was appeared at 771–883 cm −1 in the complexes confirmed the binding of thione sulphur atom to the ruthenium 53 . Vibrations corresponding to phenolic OH (ν OH ) was found at 3439–3457 cm −1 in the ligands shifted slightly lower region at 3427–3454 cm −1 in complexes ( 1–4 ), indicating the nonparticipation of the phenolic oxygen atom in coordination 54 . The electronic spectra of the complexes ( 1–4 ) (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This may be a consequence of strong Ru(II) → CO back donation as indicated by the short Ru(1) ─ C(37) (1.827(7) Å) bond and low CO stretching frequency (1952 cm −1 ), which prefers σ or π weak donor groups occupying the site opposite to CO to favour the d–π back donation. The ruthenium–ligand distances, namely Ru(1) ─ S(2) 2.4096(16) Å, Ru(1) ─ C(37) 1.826(7) Å, Ru(1) ─ P(1) 2.4025(16) Å, Ru(1) ─ Cl(1) 2.4432(16) Å, Ru(1) ─ Cl(2) 2.4750(16) Å, Ru(1) ─ P(2) 2.3964(17) Å, found in complex 2 agree well with those reported for other similar ruthenium(II) complexes containing triphenylphosphine in trans position and the carbonyl group (CO) is trans to the chlorine atom . In addition, complex 2 contains one intramolecular hydrogen bond which creates a pseudo‐chloro bridged binuclear structure (Figure S12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IR spectra of all the new complexes, a strong band in the region 1930-1965 cm −1 has been observed due to the presence of terminally coordinated carbonyl group [28]. A medium intensity band observed in the region 821-823 cm −1 in the spectra of the ligands has been assigned as due to >C S, which was completely disappeared in the complexes and a new band appeared in the region 736-755 cm −1 indicating coordination of thiolate sulphur after the enolisation of -NH-C S-group and subsequent deprotonation [31,32]. Characteristic bands due to triphenylphosphine / triphenylarsine were also present in the expected region.…”
Section: Ir Spectramentioning
confidence: 92%