2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Structure–Activity Relationship, and Mechanism of a Series of Diarylhydrazide Compounds as Potential Antifungal Agents

Abstract: A series of simple diarylhydrazide derivatives (45 examples) were well-designed, prepared, and screened for their antifungal activities both in vitro and in vivo. Bioassay results suggested that all designed compounds had significant activity against Alternaria brassicae (EC 50 = 0.30−8.35 μg/mL). Among of them, 2c, as the highest activity compound, could effectively inhibit the growth of plant pathogens Pyricularia oryza, Fusarium solani, Alternaria solani, Alternaria brassicae, and Alternaria alternate and w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed procedure for determining the effect of compound 9 on P. nicotianae mycelia was carried out according to previous methods and recommended in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detailed procedure for determining the effect of compound 9 on P. nicotianae mycelia was carried out according to previous methods and recommended in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of compound 9 on P. nicotianae cell apoptosis was studied based on a previously published method . The detailed procedures are described in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yellow liquid (35.9 mg, 51% yield); R f = 0.5 (5:1 PE/EA); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 7.36 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.59 (dd, J = 10.8, 2.1 Hz, 2H), 6.23−6.16 (m, 1H), 4.59 (s, 2H), 3.59 (brs, 2H); 13 C{ 1 H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 164.0 (dd, J = 10.5 Hz, J = 161 Hz), 153.7 (d, J = 8.6 Hz), 136.3, 128.9, 127.8, 127.6, 95.9 (dd, J = 4.7 Hz, J = 15.4 Hz), 92.9 (t, J = 17.5 Hz), 59.2; 19 N′-phenylbenzohydrazide (5a). 31 Yellow solid (51.5 mg, 81% yield); mp 171−173 °C; R f = 0.5 (2:1 PE/EA); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.40 (s, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 3H), 7.62−7.45 (m, 3H), 7.17 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.73 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H); 13 4-Ethyl-N′-phenylbenzohydrazide (5b). 32 Yellow solid (47.5 mg, 66% yield); mp 135−137 °C; R f = 0.5 (2:1 PE/ EA); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.30 (s, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.71 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (q,…”
Section: -Phenyl-1-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)hydrazine (3au)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yellow solid (44.8 mg, 53% yield); mp 161−163 °C; R f = 0.6 (2:1 PE/EA); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.32 (s, 1H), 7.90 (s, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.73 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.65−1.57 (m, 2H), 1.35−1.26 (m, 4H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13 2-Methyl-N′-phenylbenzohydrazide (5d). 31 Yellow solid (47.5 mg, 70% yield); mp 171−173 °C; R f = 0.5 (2:1 PE/EA); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.04 (s, 1H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.73 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H); 13 3-Fluoro-N′-phenylbenzohydrazide (5e). 33 Yellow solid (27.6 mg, 40% yield); mp 188−190 °C; R f = 0.7 (2:1 PE/ EA); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.48 (s, 1H), 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (q, J = 4.8 Hz, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 6.73 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H); 13 3-Bromo-N′-phenylbenzohydrazide (5f).…”
Section: -Pentyl-n′-phenylbenzohydrazide (5c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sclerotiorum , a necrotrophic phytopathogenic fungus distributed globally, is capable of causing various symptoms, such as stem rot and pod reduction, leading to annual production losses of 10–50% [ 7 , 8 ]. At present, the application of chemical pesticides is the most effective measure to manage bacterial and fungal diseases of crops [ 9 , 10 ]. However, the misuse and overuse of many conventional pesticides for a long time have created ever-rising resistance, resulting in a significant decrease in the control efficacy of commercial agents [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%