2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, stabilization, and characterization of the MR1 ligand precursor 5-amino-6-D-ribitylaminouracil (5-A-RU)

Abstract: Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are an abundant class of innate T cells restricted by the MHC I-related molecule MR1. MAIT cells can recognize bacterially-derived metabolic intermediates from the riboflavin pathway presented by MR1 and are postulated to play a role in innate antibacterial immunity through production of cytokines and direct bacterial killing. MR1 tetramers, typically stabilized by the adduct of 5-amino-6-D-ribitylaminouracil (5-A-RU) and methylglyoxal (MeG), are important tools for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(71 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential activation potentials of MAIT cell subsets. To profile the abundance and activation status of MAIT cells in household contacts and controls, we used 5-OP-RU-loaded MR1 tetramers to identify MAIT cells and deployed an ex vivo activation assay with MR1 ligand, 5-A-RU/MeG (35,49). MAIT cells were identified as tetramer + CD161 ++ (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Differential activation potentials of MAIT cell subsets. To profile the abundance and activation status of MAIT cells in household contacts and controls, we used 5-OP-RU-loaded MR1 tetramers to identify MAIT cells and deployed an ex vivo activation assay with MR1 ligand, 5-A-RU/MeG (35,49). MAIT cells were identified as tetramer + CD161 ++ (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter study did observe an enrichment of CD4 + /Vα7.2 + /CD161 ++ cells in LTBI subjects compared with active TB cases, but the identity of these cells was unknown. The availability of MR1-5-OP-RU tetramers (27,35,52) has allowed for accurate identification of MAIT cell subsets, highlighting the importance of subset heterogeneity that may not be easily detected without also staining for TCR coreceptors (51, 52). Kurioka et al (51) assessed functional differences between CD4 + , CD8 + , and DN MAIT cells in healthy donors, demonstrating that CD8 + and DN MAIT cells were more reactive and polarized toward a Th1 phenotype with E. coli activation, whereas CD4 + MAIT cells were biased toward a Th2 phenotype, with higher levels of intracellular IL-4 and IL-13 detected by intracellular staining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In vivo modeling of MAIT cell responses against Mtb have been limited by low MAIT cell abundance in specific pathogen free (SPF) mice (<1% of T cells) relative to the generally more abundant MAIT cell populations observed in humans (<1-18% of T cells) (2,26,27). Despite low abundance of MAIT cell populations in SPF mice, several recent studies demonstrate that intranasal priming with bacteria or synthetic MR1 ligands can induce robust MAIT cell accumulation in the lung (27)(28)(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%