2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-016-1907-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, refinement of the structure, and AC conductivity behavior of sodium lithium orthonavadates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained patterns were in close agreement with the orthorhombic structure belonging to space group Cmcm. XRD profiles of all specimens match well with our previous work [15] It was observed that Sm 3+ doping NaCdVO 4 did not influence the main structure of the host because no significant shift of observed peaks in series of doped samples since the doping with Sm 3+ which it's ionic radii r(Sm 3+ , CN=6)=1.09 Å [16] into the Cd 2+ ( [r(Cd 3+ , CN=6)=0.95 Å] site is assumed owing to the small radius percentage difference Dr of both ions. In fact, the percentage difference in ionic radii between substituted and doped ions should be less than 30%.…”
Section: Results and Discussion A X-ray Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The obtained patterns were in close agreement with the orthorhombic structure belonging to space group Cmcm. XRD profiles of all specimens match well with our previous work [15] It was observed that Sm 3+ doping NaCdVO 4 did not influence the main structure of the host because no significant shift of observed peaks in series of doped samples since the doping with Sm 3+ which it's ionic radii r(Sm 3+ , CN=6)=1.09 Å [16] into the Cd 2+ ( [r(Cd 3+ , CN=6)=0.95 Å] site is assumed owing to the small radius percentage difference Dr of both ions. In fact, the percentage difference in ionic radii between substituted and doped ions should be less than 30%.…”
Section: Results and Discussion A X-ray Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%