2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b01253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Optimization, and Performance Demonstration of Electrospun Carbon Nanofiber–Carbon Nanotube Composite Sorbents for Point-of-Use Water Treatment

Abstract: We developed an electrospun carbon nanofiber-carbon nanotube (CNF-CNT) composite with optimal sorption capacity and material strength for point-of-use (POU) water treatment. Synthesis variables including integration of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and macroporosity (via sublimation of phthalic acid), relative humidity (20 and 40%), and stabilization temperature (250 and 280 °C) were used to control nanofiber diameter and surface area (from electron microscopy and BET isotherms, respectively), surface co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All ENMs were fabricated using a custom-built electrospinning apparatus described in our previous work (Figure S1). 20 Additional details of the polymers, the electrospinning apparatus and synthesis parameters are presented in the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All ENMs were fabricated using a custom-built electrospinning apparatus described in our previous work (Figure S1). 20 Additional details of the polymers, the electrospinning apparatus and synthesis parameters are presented in the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the predominant efficiency of carbon and metal oxide adsorbent surfaces suggests that π-π electron and electrostatic interactions are the most efficient adsorption mechanisms towards selected pesticides, compared to hydrophobic interactions, which by comparison reached average performance when serving as the predominant mechanism at stake [29]. Furthermore, carbon nanofibers were reported to show adsorptive affinity for other contaminants, such as sulfamethoxazole, in a multi-contaminant flow through adsorption test, demonstrating the versatility of carbonaceous adsorbents towards organic molecules with unsaturated bonds such as aromatic rings [39]. Polystyrene molecular imprinted nanofibers showed limited performance against Atrazine and Chlorpyrifos (Table 4, N2 and Table 5, N1).…”
Section: Impact Of Adsorbent Specific and Contact Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular orientation of the contaminant is also considered to prevent size-exclusion effects when one molecule is already adsorbed along a pore wall, as highlighted by the performance comparison of Dieldrin and stereoisomer Endrin adsorption [73]. Adsorbent contact surface area ruled by the nanofiber average diameter impacted on the contaminant capture, with diameters below 150 nm yielding higher performance in the capture of Atrazine [39]. Higher surface specific areas led in general to higher adsorption capacities, provided there was contaminant diffusion along the surface pore channels.…”
Section: Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of CFs by electrospinning was established about 10 years ago and has gradually become popular due to their excellent properties. The limitations of the strength, porosity, wettability, conductivity, and surface area of pure CNFs hinder their use as reliable materials for different types of applications . CNFs can be easily obtained by electrospinning of a PAN solution under a specific condition and following carbonisation treatments .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNTs are considered to be a promising sorbent in water treatments because both functionalised and non‐functionalised CNTs have been shown to be highly effective sorbents for aquatic pollutants . N‐doped CNTs proved to be better sorbents for π‐donor aromatic compounds ,. CNTs have a remarkable electrical capacitance >158 Fg −1 due to their large surface area and excellent electronic‐ionic conductivity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%