2013
DOI: 10.1021/ja411423a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of Uranium–Ligand Multiple Bonds by Cleavage of a Trityl Protecting Group

Abstract: Addition of KSCPh3 to [U(NR2)3] (R = SiMe3) in tetrahydrofuran, followed by addition of 18-crown-6, results in formation of the U(IV) sulfide, [K(18-crown-6)][U(S)(NR2)3] (1) and Gomberg's dimer. Similarly, addition of KOCPh3 to [U(NR2)3] in tetrahydrofuran, followed by addition of 18-crown-6, results in formation of the U(IV) oxide, [K(18-crown-6)][U(O)(NR2)3] (3). Also observed in this transformation are the triphenylmethyl anion, [K(18-crown-6)(THF)2][CPh3] (5), and the U(IV) alkoxide, [U(OCPh3)(NR2)3] (4).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

12
76
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
12
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The single other reported crystal structure of this type was published by Thomas and co‐workers in their studies of Co/Zr heterobimetallic catalytic hydrosilylation, [N 2 Co(MesNP i Pr 2 ) 3 Zr(OCPhPh‐CPh 2 O)Zr(MesNP i Pr 2 ) 3 CoN 2 ], which had the shortest coupled C−C bond length at 1.496(5) Å . Compared with the reported U IV (OCPh 3 )[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 , which had a U−O bond length of 2.098(3) Å, compound 1.2 had similar U−O bond lengths, averaging 2.102(5) Å . Additionally, the average U−N amide bonds were comparable with bond lengths of 2.281(4) and 2.284(6) Å for U IV (OCPh 3 )[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 and 1.2 respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The single other reported crystal structure of this type was published by Thomas and co‐workers in their studies of Co/Zr heterobimetallic catalytic hydrosilylation, [N 2 Co(MesNP i Pr 2 ) 3 Zr(OCPhPh‐CPh 2 O)Zr(MesNP i Pr 2 ) 3 CoN 2 ], which had the shortest coupled C−C bond length at 1.496(5) Å . Compared with the reported U IV (OCPh 3 )[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 , which had a U−O bond length of 2.098(3) Å, compound 1.2 had similar U−O bond lengths, averaging 2.102(5) Å . Additionally, the average U−N amide bonds were comparable with bond lengths of 2.281(4) and 2.284(6) Å for U IV (OCPh 3 )[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 and 1.2 respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Synthesis of Tp* 2 U IV O was accomplished by O‐atom transfer from pyridine‐ N ‐oxide and TEMPO to Tp* 2 U III (2,2′‐bpy) and Tp* 2 U III (OC⋅Ph 2 ), respectively . The Hayton group has synthesized a capped uranium(IV) oxo complex, [K(18‐crown‐6)][U IV O[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 , by reductive deprotection of a trityl alkoxide complex, U IV (OCPh 3 )[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 . This is a similar strategy to ours, though differentiated by our use of organic amides as oxo transfer reagents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This desire stems not only from a need to develop our knowledge and understanding of actinide bonding at a fundamental level45678, but also because of potential applications in nuclear waste clean-up which might utilize extraction methods that exploit covalency differences in metal-ligand bonding9. Because actinide-ligand multiple bonds arguably contain the greatest opportunities to probe covalency101112, in recent years in addition to numerous oxo complexes12 there has been intensive progress in uranium-carbene13141516171819, -imido202122232425262728, -nitride29303132, -phosphinidene/-arsinidene/-arsenido33343536 and -chalcogenido (S, Se, Te) chemistry37383940. This work demonstrates the wide range of multiply bonded ligands that can be stabilised at uranium with appropriate supporting ligands, and also that softer, heavier main group element centres can be stabilised as well as relatively hard first-row elements such as C, N and O.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the procedure was carried out without the mixed solvent conditions, we observed multiple paramagnetic species by 1 H NMR spectroscopy, which included small amounts of the bridging nitride complex [(Me 3 Si) 2 N ] 3 U V (N)U IV [N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 , the X‐ray structure of which is included in the Supporting Information (Figure S26). The formation of actinide ligand multiple bonds by trityl deprotection has been established by the Hayton group to yield [An IV (=S)[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 ] − [An IV (=O)[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 ] − (An=U, Th) complexes . It is feasible that [(Me 3 Si) 2 N ] 3 U V (N)U IV [N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 was produced from a similar reaction pathway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%