The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2010.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of two new group 13 benzoato–chloro complexes: A structural study of gallium and indium chelating carboxylates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the Al–O = 1.975(1) Å or Al1–O1 = 1.986(2) Å and Al1–O2 = 1.977(2) Å, (for 3a or 3b ) and the Al–Cl (2.232(1) Å) or Al1–Cl1 = 2.249(1) Å and Al1–Cl1 = 2.214(1) Å (for 3a or 3b , respectively) distances are slightly longer than those observed for the four-coordinate dimer 1a , and the axial Al1–N1 distances are 2.057(3) or 2.043(3) and Al1–N2 distances are 2.065(3) Å or 2.046(3) for 3a or 3b , respectively. Compounds 3a and 3b represent unique examples of monomeric aluminum carboxylates with a chelating carboxylate ligand (structurally characterized analogous gallium carboxylate was also reported very recently). It is worthy to note that our previous theoretical calculations on the relative stability of various structures of the type 3 adducts confirmed that the formation of the six-coordinate chelate structure is thermodynamically preferred which is in agreement with the experimental data …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Both the Al–O = 1.975(1) Å or Al1–O1 = 1.986(2) Å and Al1–O2 = 1.977(2) Å, (for 3a or 3b ) and the Al–Cl (2.232(1) Å) or Al1–Cl1 = 2.249(1) Å and Al1–Cl1 = 2.214(1) Å (for 3a or 3b , respectively) distances are slightly longer than those observed for the four-coordinate dimer 1a , and the axial Al1–N1 distances are 2.057(3) or 2.043(3) and Al1–N2 distances are 2.065(3) Å or 2.046(3) for 3a or 3b , respectively. Compounds 3a and 3b represent unique examples of monomeric aluminum carboxylates with a chelating carboxylate ligand (structurally characterized analogous gallium carboxylate was also reported very recently). It is worthy to note that our previous theoretical calculations on the relative stability of various structures of the type 3 adducts confirmed that the formation of the six-coordinate chelate structure is thermodynamically preferred which is in agreement with the experimental data …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…An intriguing case of the dormant Lewis acidity is associated with the chemistry of dichloroaluminium 4 and dichlorogallium 5 carboxylates. These compounds react with Lewis bases to form a large structural variety of adducts ranging from molecular complexes to ionic species exhibiting different coordination numbers of the metal centres and various coordination modes of carboxylate ligands (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature concerning reactions of group 13 organometallic carboxylates with Lewis bases is very limited. Simple Lewis acid–base adducts between a mononuclear group 13 organometallic carboxylate moiety and Lewis base are lacking, and only very recently, the first dichloroaluminum and gallium adducts with γ-picoline (py-Me), [Cl 2 M(λ 2 -O 2 CPh)(py-Me) 2 ], which feature a nonbridging and M-chelating carboxylate ligand, were reported . Similarly, the indium homologue forms [Cl 2 In-(λ 2 -O 2 CPh)(py-Me) 2 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%