The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1975
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(75)90696-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of the new neutron-deficient isotopes 250102, 242Fm, and 254Ku

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The listed values are experimental maximum cross sections if excitation functions were measured [15,17,29] or calculated maximum cross sections if only the average thick target production cross sections were measured [14,16,30]. In the latter cases the values listed in Table 2 were deduced from the target thickness and an assumed width of the corresponding excitation function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The listed values are experimental maximum cross sections if excitation functions were measured [15,17,29] or calculated maximum cross sections if only the average thick target production cross sections were measured [14,16,30]. In the latter cases the values listed in Table 2 were deduced from the target thickness and an assumed width of the corresponding excitation function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental techniques used to determine the cross sections summarized in Table 2 Table 2. Maximum cross sections for the production of fermium evaporation residues from the fusion reaction between argon and lead ; (14) ") this work b) unweighted average ~) spontaneous fission decay from 246Fm measured; assumed fission branch 8 ~o [26] otherwise detected by its c~-decay are, i) mechanical rotating wheel systems as used in this work which transport the reaction products continuously out of the beam into shielded positions where fission-track detectors register spontaneous fission decay [14][15][16]30], ii) a gas-jet system [293 which transports reaction products to collecting foils where the deposited activity is measured for c~-and spontaneous fission decay, iii) an in-beam detection system [31], where recoiling products were stopped in hydrogen gas and fission fragments detected by several ionisation chambers positioned around the stopping area, and iv) a velocity filter [32] able to separate in flight fusion products from the faster beam particles and the bulk of other reaction products [17]. Despite the very different techniques applied, the cross sections listed in Table 2 agree in general within about a factor of three.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data used for the comparison are collected in Table 1. They are taken from [17][18][19][20][21] given in the fourth and sixth columns of the table.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final product of the reactions studied, Zg4Fm, undergoes spontaneous fission with a 100 ~o probability and has a half-life of about 4 ms [1, 71. These properties of 244Fm permitted its detection using a comparatively simple technique [3] as follows. Recoil nuclei knocked out from the target were stopped in a rotating disk and transported to mica detectors of spontaneous fission fragments.…”
Section: Description Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%