2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of quinolinomorphinan derivatives as highly selective δ opioid receptor ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General procedures and materials. Compounds 2 44 , 3 45 , 9 46 , 12 47 , 13 48 and PEtG-control 35 High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed using a Finnigan MAT 8400 electron impact (EI) mass spectrometer or Bruker microOTOF 11 electrospray mass spectrometer (ESI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…General procedures and materials. Compounds 2 44 , 3 45 , 9 46 , 12 47 , 13 48 and PEtG-control 35 High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed using a Finnigan MAT 8400 electron impact (EI) mass spectrometer or Bruker microOTOF 11 electrospray mass spectrometer (ESI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the above work demonstrates that diverse stimuli can be used to trigger PEtG depolymerization, for some applications it may be beneficial to develop a versatile end-capping strategy that allows the polymer to respond to multiple stimuli, either individually or simultaneously. To prepare an end-cap responsive to multiple stimuli, the previously reported aniline 9 46 was reacted with chloroformate 4 in the presence of Na 2 CO 3 in THF/H 2 O at 0 °C to functionalize the aniline group selectively, affording compound 10 (Scheme 3). The benzylic alcohol of 10 was then reacted with phosgene to provide the chloroformate-activated end-cap 11.…”
Section: Development Of Multi-responsive End-capsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield the title compound as a white solid (0.46 g, 79%); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 2.64 (s, 3H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 6.89-7.17 (m, 1H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 11.19 (s, 1H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 29.0, 52.7, 119.6, 121.8, 121.9, 132.1, 135.5, 141.8, 154.8, 202.7 Methyl (2-formyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)carbamate (1c). Following the general procedure starting from (2-amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methanol, 23 the title compound was obtained as a white solid (0.65 g, 65%); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 3.84 (s, 3H), 7.31-7.57 (m, 1H), 7.61-8.04 (m, 1H), 8.80 (s, 1H), 9.99 (s, 1H), 10.64 (br s, 1H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 52.7, 115.6 (q, 3 J CF = 4.1 Hz), 118.3 (q, 3 J CF = 4.0 Hz), 122.8 (q, 4 J CF = 1.4 Hz), 122.9 (q, 1 J CF = 236.7 Hz) 136.2 (s), 136.8 (d, 2 J CF = 32.6 Hz), 141. 5, 153.9, 194.4 Methyl (3-chloro-2-formylphenyl)carbamate (1e).…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield proved relatively low, most likely because of the presence of the carboxylic acid moiety. An attempt to obtain 6 by reducing the carboxylic acid of compound 5 following the method introduced by Y. Ida et al [ 18 ] was not successful. The esterification of 5 was carried out in methanol in the presence of SOCl 2 to afford 7 [ 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%