“… , In this context, the synthetically viable transition metal-catalyzed directing group (DG) that promoted annulation of inert C–H bonds has principally been found to be beneficial for the fabrication of complex heterocycles. , Thus, the domain of monoannulation strategies has widely been investigated by roping the heteroatom of the DG along with inert C–H bonds (close proximity to the DG) of the molecular scaffold and/or a connecting unit (olefin/alkyne/carbene/etc. ). ,− In addition, multiple C–H bonds have been used in the development of stepwise (under different catalytic conditions; Scheme A) and sequential (one catalytic system with successive addition of reactive agents; Scheme A) annulation methods for the construction of π-extended fused heterocycles. , However, in most cases, a single o -C–H bond of the parent hetero(arene) motif has exclusively been involved in the double annulations with alkynes accessing linearly fused π-extended heterocycles (path I, Scheme B). , On the other hand, both o -C–H bonds of hetero(arenes) for the identical double annulation with alkynes to the synthesis of an angularly fused π-extended heterocycle has been less explored (path II, Scheme B); mainly, the molecular rigidity and conformation strain obstruct this challenging transformation. , Moreover, the undisputed concerns, i.e., uncontrolled reactivity and the lack of selectivity attenuated in each annulation and the catalyst dependable DG-assisted functionalization of a particular o -C–H bond, make the angular double annulations ineffective (path II, Scheme B) . In spite of these challenges, both o -C–H bonds of benzoylacetonitrile, enaminoester, or polyaromatic aldehyde have successfully been employed for the one-pot double annulation with alkynes in the presence of rhodium (Rh) catalyst.…”