2014
DOI: 10.1101/012260
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life

Abstract: Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all lineages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous character data across disparately related lineages currently renders direct phylogenetic inference untenable. To reconstruct a comprehensive tree of life we therefore synthesized published phylogenies, together with taxonomic classifications for taxa never incorporated into a phylogeny. We present a draft tree containing 2.3 million tips-the Open Tree of Life. Realization of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-metric phylogenetic tree shown in figure 5 was extracted from Version 3 Draft synthetic tree of life (Hinchliff et al 2015). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-metric phylogenetic tree shown in figure 5 was extracted from Version 3 Draft synthetic tree of life (Hinchliff et al 2015). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining a fully resolved phylogenetic tree with branch lengths for diverse taxa is notoriously difficult given that homologous character data are often not available across disparate lineages, and tree topology can be unresolved (Chamberlain et al, 2012;Hinchcliff et al, 2015). Nonetheless, ignoring phylogenetic relatedness among species can affect meta-analytic results (Chamberlain et al, 2012).…”
Section: (4) Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guild data are from FUNGuild (Nguyen et al, 2016) and genus-to-order matching is from Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org). The tree topology was constructed manually following Hinchliff et al (2015) and Open Tree of Life (https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/opentree/opentree10.4@ott352914/Fungi). The phylogeny is order level and branch lengths are not time calibrated.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent effort to build a comprehensive fungal tree of life that includes all recognized species was conducted by the Open Tree of Life project (https://blog.opentreeoflife.org). An important innovation was synthesizing information from published phylogenies and taxonomic classifications including taxa never before incorporated into phylogenies (Hinchliff et al, 2015). Currently, however, the fungal tree, although taxonomically comprehensive, is highly unresolved including numerous redundant names.…”
Section: Linking Fungal Diversity To Taxonomic Names Within Systmentioning
confidence: 99%