1976
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1976.1141369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of nonuniformly spaced arrays using a general nonlinear minimax optimisation method

Abstract: This comes from the fact that surface current distribution (30) is calculated from I& only. So the far-field calculations correspond to (19). In fact, there is a constant proportionality between f,, F,, and.&., F, from (19) and (31). As D/I increases, the angle 0, which sees the main lobe and first few sidelobes, gets smaller so the term (1cos 0) approaches zero yielding zero far-field cross polarization provided polarization purity is achieved at the aperture plane. CONCLUSIONS All these considerations lead u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Optimal weights to minimize main lobe width or maximum side lobe level for an equally spaced linear array can be analytically calculated using Dolph-Chebyshev array weighting.…”
Section: Optimization Of Weights To Minimize the Maximum Side Lobementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Optimal weights to minimize main lobe width or maximum side lobe level for an equally spaced linear array can be analytically calculated using Dolph-Chebyshev array weighting.…”
Section: Optimization Of Weights To Minimize the Maximum Side Lobementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like all of the previously cited papers, our approach is based on allowing elements only on a fixed underlying grid of positions as opposed to what was done in [23]. The approach taken there is that they leave out the weights and search for the element positions that give minimum peak sidelobe levels.…”
Section: Optimization Of Sparse Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The optimization region in k-space, containing the visible regioneverything inside the radius |k| = 2π/λ except the mainlobe region which is inside a radius of |k| = 2π/λ sin φ 1 (from [19] …”
Section: • Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical factors affecting performance include acoustic environment, source spectral content, processing algorithm, and microphone geometry. For a fixed number of microphones it has been demonstrated that the array geometry is the dominant factor for performance [3][4][5]. However, previous studies have largely focused on regular geometries in far-field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most of these analyses have been done for narrow-band far-field cases where spatial aliasing is directly related to microphone spacing and resolution to aperture. Irregular arrays, which diversify microphone positions, can potentially achieve better performance, as demonstrated in [3,4,7]. Instead of limited optimal range of signal frequency for regular arrays, irregular arrays can result in a more consistent performance over a broader range of frequencies, such as those associated with speech [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%