Nanoplatform‐Based Molecular Imaging 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470767047.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of Nanomaterials as a Platform for Molecular Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of bionanotechnology has also bolstered this field by providing nanocarriers that package optical dyes and agents for other modalities. [84] These multimodality agents provide opportunities to combine an enzyme-responsive MRI contrast agent with a “control” agent for a different imaging modality that can account for pharmacokinetic delivery and other environmental conditions that may affect the signal from the MRI contrast agent. This comparison of the contrast changes from an enzyme-responsive agent and an unresponsive control agent is critical for improving the specificity of in vivo enzyme detection.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of bionanotechnology has also bolstered this field by providing nanocarriers that package optical dyes and agents for other modalities. [84] These multimodality agents provide opportunities to combine an enzyme-responsive MRI contrast agent with a “control” agent for a different imaging modality that can account for pharmacokinetic delivery and other environmental conditions that may affect the signal from the MRI contrast agent. This comparison of the contrast changes from an enzyme-responsive agent and an unresponsive control agent is critical for improving the specificity of in vivo enzyme detection.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence imaging is based on fluorescent molecules that can be excited by particular light source, causing electron transition following energy dissipation via fluorescence emission. In order to enhance imaging quality, a number of different fluorescent imaging contrast agents have been developed, including small molecular organic dyes, [3] organic nanoparticles (NPs), [4] inorganic nanoparticles [5] (e. g., quantum dots, rare‐earth metal ion‐doped upconversion NPs, metallic NPs), in which organic dyes have attracted more attention due to their specified structures, easy modifications, and high biocompatibility. However, traditional fluorescent dyes are easily quenched in the aggregated state, which refers to a common phenomenon as aggregation‐caused quenching (ACQ) due to π–π stacking [6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] This window of opportunity for imaging can be lengthened even further, however, by employing targeted ultrasound contrast technology. 9,10 By attaching biological markers to the surface of the ultrasound contrast microbubble, the contrast agent can target and tether to physiologic markers in vivo. 5,6,[9][10][11][12] This allows for not only elongated imaging time but also the evaluation of biochemical processes at the molecular level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 By attaching biological markers to the surface of the ultrasound contrast microbubble, the contrast agent can target and tether to physiologic markers in vivo. 5,6,[9][10][11][12] This allows for not only elongated imaging time but also the evaluation of biochemical processes at the molecular level. 5,6,[9][10][11]13 The composition of ultrasound contrast microbubbles causes them to be restricted to the vascular compartment, and they are therefore ideal for investigating disease processes taking place on the endothelial surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation