2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with histidine and nickel to immobilize His-tagged enzymes using β-galactosidase as a model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The determined magnetization of BION and the only slight decrease by around 5 emu g –1 upon protein adsorption are consistent with already published data. , Also, the strong shielding of the magnetization due to the coating of ION@TEOS agrees with the literature. , The larger intrinsic magnetization of BION and BION@rSpA likely contributed to the generally faster determined magnetophoretic sedimentation velocities compared to ION@TEOS (Figure E). In addition, the magnetophoretic velocity strongly correlates with the hydrodynamic diameter. , Thus, the increased agglomeration seen for the uncoated particles probably also benefited the fast magnetophoretic attraction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The determined magnetization of BION and the only slight decrease by around 5 emu g –1 upon protein adsorption are consistent with already published data. , Also, the strong shielding of the magnetization due to the coating of ION@TEOS agrees with the literature. , The larger intrinsic magnetization of BION and BION@rSpA likely contributed to the generally faster determined magnetophoretic sedimentation velocities compared to ION@TEOS (Figure E). In addition, the magnetophoretic velocity strongly correlates with the hydrodynamic diameter. , Thus, the increased agglomeration seen for the uncoated particles probably also benefited the fast magnetophoretic attraction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Biocatalysts are susceptible to various environmental pressures (high temperature, pH, organic reagents, and ionic strength). Hence, immobilized enzymes are often expected to have excellent temperature and pH stability. As shown in Figure E,F, the thermal stabilities of both single CLEAs were significantly enhanced compared to free enzymes. Especially for Rha1, after pre-treatment at 80 °C for 2 h, the enzyme activity of free Rha1 was completely lost, whereas the relative activity of Rha1-CLEAs was still 54.19% of its maximum activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on the Arrhenius method, the deactivation energy (Eq. (4) ) was obtained with the following equation [ 45 ]: where k d is the deactivation rate constant, A is a constant, E d is the deactivation energy, R (8.314 × 10 −3 kJ mol −1 K −1 ) is the universal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. The time required for the enzyme to show a decrease to 50% of the initial activity (half-life) is t 1/2 = ln 2/ k .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) ) increased slightly from 102.54 to 103.22 kJ/mol for the immobilized enzyme. This demonstrated that immobilization improved the thermal stability of the enzyme, making it more resistant to denaturation and conformational changes [ 47 ]. As seen in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%