“…Over the last decade, systematic research into the phenomenon of the self-disproportionation of enantiomers (SDE) [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ] has clearly revealed that the accuracy in reporting the stereochemical outcome of enantioselective reactions represents a major issue of concern in terms of data integrity and the understanding of the stereochemical mechanisms at play and the interpretation of the results. It has been unequivocally shown that any physicochemical treatment, including achiral chromatography [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] or even rotary evaporation [ 40 , 44 ], of a scalemic sample inevitably leads to fractionation of the material into portions of variable enantiomeric excess (ee), with consequent erroneous reporting of the stereochemical outcome if due care is not taken. Yet, there is a deficiency in the general understanding and appreciation of the SDE phenomenon, even though it has been known for a considerable length of time now.…”