“…In organic electronics, the control over the materials morphology at the nanoscale has a huge interest to improve the electronic device performances, in particular for charge transport in field-effect transistors and for charge separation and transport in photovoltaic cells. − Rod–coil block copolymers containing one semiconducting segment, e.g., poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), contribute to that issue by their tendency to nanophase separation upon self-assembly. Such copolymers have been used to produce nanofibrillar morphologies where the width of nanofibrils can be controlled by the length of the P3HT rod segment, the composition of the block copolymer, and the processing conditions. − To date a large number of active layers based on rod–coil and coil–rod–coil block copolymers containing P3HT as the “rod-like” segment have been reported. − As “coil-like” segments, poly(urethane), poly(styrene), − poly(isoprene), poly(methacrylate), , poly(methyl acrylate), poly(butyl acrylate), poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(acrylic acid), poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate), , poly(4-vinylpyridine), poly(2-vinylpyridine), poly(ethylene glycol), , poly(ethylene), poly( p -styrenesulfonate), and stereocomplexed poly(lactide) have been used. The presence of the nonconjugated block can have a strong influence on the crystallinity of the materials and allows for the formation of specific morphologies.…”