1981
DOI: 10.1021/ic50216a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of alkyne complexes of the type Ta(.eta.5-C5Me5)(alkyne)Cl2 and crystal structure of (.eta.5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(diphenylacetylene)dichlorotantalum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
1
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
5
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The angle θ between the Mo-C(6)-C(7) plane and the plane defined by Mo, CNT (center of gravity of the Cp ring), and the midpoint of the C(6)-C(7) vector is 85.61°. This tilting away from the ideal parallel conformation (θ = 90°) is less pronounced relative to the previously reported W(III) complex (η 5 -C5Me4Bu t )WCl2(MeC≡CMe) (θ = 77.16°) 24 and slightly more relative to Cp*TaCl2(PhC≡CPh) (θ = 87.27°) 36 and (η 5 -C5H4Me)NbCl2(ArC≡CAr) (Ar = C6H4CH3-4, θ = 86.40°). 37 Table 2 collects relevant bond distances and angles, in comparison with those of the above mentioned Nb analogue (η 5 -C5H4Me)NbCl2(ArC≡CAr) 38 and of geometry optimised HC≡CH model compounds (vide infra).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The angle θ between the Mo-C(6)-C(7) plane and the plane defined by Mo, CNT (center of gravity of the Cp ring), and the midpoint of the C(6)-C(7) vector is 85.61°. This tilting away from the ideal parallel conformation (θ = 90°) is less pronounced relative to the previously reported W(III) complex (η 5 -C5Me4Bu t )WCl2(MeC≡CMe) (θ = 77.16°) 24 and slightly more relative to Cp*TaCl2(PhC≡CPh) (θ = 87.27°) 36 and (η 5 -C5H4Me)NbCl2(ArC≡CAr) (Ar = C6H4CH3-4, θ = 86.40°). 37 Table 2 collects relevant bond distances and angles, in comparison with those of the above mentioned Nb analogue (η 5 -C5H4Me)NbCl2(ArC≡CAr) 38 and of geometry optimised HC≡CH model compounds (vide infra).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…We reasoned that a comparison of the structural data for the two complexes would provide an insight into the nature of the bond between the metal center and the phosphaalkyne. In this study we focused on the report that the well‐characterized (NMR, X‐ray) d 2 complex [TaCl 2 ( η 5 ‐C 5 Me 5 ){ η 2 (4e)‐PhC 2 Ph}]3 can be synthesized by reaction of PhC≡CPh with the labile complex [TaCl 2 ( η 5 ‐C 5 Me 5 )(CO) 2 (thf)] 4. This suggested that the tantalum dicarbonyl complex might also react with t BuC≡P to form a novel η 2 (4e)‐bonded phosphaalkyne complex.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkenes (typically styrene or cyclooctene) are readily displaced f r o m Cp*Ta(r| 2 -alkene)X 2 (X = Cl or Br) to afford Cp*Ta(ROCR)Cl 2 (ROCR = PhOCPh, PhOCH, MeOCMe, EtOCEt, or HOCH). 418 It is interesting that none o f these complexes reacts with excess alkyne to f o r m metallacyclopentadienes. The alkoxide derivatives Cp*Ta(PhOCPh)(0Me)Cl and Cp*Ta(PhOCPh)(0Me) 2 are available f r o m Cp*Ta(PhOCPh)Cl 2 and NaOMe.…”
Section: (I) Monokis(cyclopentadienyl) Alkyne Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alkoxide derivatives Cp*Ta(PhOCPh)(0Me)Cl and Cp*Ta(PhOCPh)(0Me) 2 are available f r o m Cp*Ta(PhOCPh)Cl 2 and NaOMe. 418 When Cp*Ta(TMS)Cl 3 is refluxed in benzene in the presence o f alkyne, reductive elimination o f TMS-C1 occurs and the d 2 adducts Cp*Ta(ROCR)Cl 2 (ROCR = PhOCPh, HOCPh, MeOCMe, or TMS-OC-TMS) are available. 212 Perhaps the most intriguing reaction to give rise to cyclopentadienyl alkyne complexes is the cycloaddition sequence involving the tantalum alkylidyne complex [Cl 2 (DME)Ta(|Li-CBu t )] 2 [Zn((a-Cl) 2 ] (23).…”
Section: (I) Monokis(cyclopentadienyl) Alkyne Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%