“…Nucleoside analogue antivirals act, after bioactivation by host or viral kinases to active triphosphates, by competing with native nucleotides for incorporation by viral RdRp into nascent viral RNA, leading to either chain termination and prevention of viral replication or accumulation of lethal mutations in viral progeny. Since the approval of the first nucleoside analogue antiviralidoxuridine in 1962, the nucleoside analogue class has become the largest among antivirals in clinical use. , In pursuit of more anticancer and antiviral nucleoside analogues, extensive and productive modifications have since been made to the ribose and nucleobase moieties of the nucleoside scaffold, which an interested reader may learn more about in a recent two-part review by Seley-Radtke and Yates. , Extensions of the nucleoside approach seeking to bypass the rate-limiting initial phosphorylation of nucleosides by the installation of isosteric and isoelectric phosphonates (which also reduce susceptibility to cleavage by cellular phosphatases) at the 5′-OH position have proven an important development, and the bioavailability issues presented by such polar modifications are currently being tackled by phosphate esters, phosphonamidates, and phosphoramidates within the pro-nucleotide (ProTide) framework. − Modifications at the 1′ position, however, are fraught with issues of stability and early explorations at this position furnished analogues showing chemical instability or weak to no antiviral activity. − While the N-glycoside linkages of native nucleosides are generally physiologically stable, they are unstable to acid hydrolysis and the action of cellular hydrolases . Enzymatic cleavage of glycosidic bonds is generally catalyzed by nucleophile activation, nucleobase leaving group stabilization, and oxocarbenium ion stabilization .…”