2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2003.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, molecular, crystal and electronic structures of [(C6H6)RuCl(HPz)2]Cl and [(C6H6)RuCl2(Me2HPz)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carboxylate group and pyridyl moiety of 2 are inclined at 12.6(9)°, and Ru(1) atom deviates 0.33(1) from the aromatic ring lest squares plane. The bond lengths and angles in the studied complexes are comparable to those reported to analogues compounds [40].…”
Section: Crystal Structuressupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The carboxylate group and pyridyl moiety of 2 are inclined at 12.6(9)°, and Ru(1) atom deviates 0.33(1) from the aromatic ring lest squares plane. The bond lengths and angles in the studied complexes are comparable to those reported to analogues compounds [40].…”
Section: Crystal Structuressupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The bond lengths of Ru-Cl and Ru-N were 2.408 and 2.082 Å in the complex. The Ru-Cl distance was comparable with the distance in other ruthenium complexes containing nitrogen heterocyclic ligands [25,26]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The formation of these complexes 5a and 5b were conveniently monitored by the peak ratio in the 1 H NMR spectra and by elemental analyses. The infrared spectra of these complexes show a strong band in the range of 3283-3138 cm À1 due to the m N-H mode of the pyrazole ligands [30]. In addition, the IR spectra contain strong bands at 1573-1527 cm À1 due to the m C-N mode of the pyrazole ligands, and a strong band at 1082 cm À1 due to the m B-F mode of the BF 4 group.…”
Section: Monomeric Complexesmentioning
confidence: 94%