Synthesis, Kinetic Study and Molecular Orbital Investigation of Cadmium(<scp>II</scp>), Mercury(<scp>II</scp>) and Lead(<scp>II</scp>) Complexes with the Mixed Pendant‐Arm Macrocyclic Ligand 1,7‐Bis(carboxymethyl)‐4,10‐bis(1‐methylimidazol‐2‐ylmethyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane

We have carried out a study about the structural effect of the lone-pair activity in lead(II) complexes with the unsymmetrical lariat ethers L(7), L(8), (L(8)-H)-, (L(9)-H)-, and (L(10)-H)-. All these ligands are octadentate and differ by the aromatic unit present in their backbones: pyridine, phenol, phenolate, thiophenolate, and pyrrolate, respectively. In these lead(II) complexes, the receptor may adopt two possible syn conformations, depending on the disposition of the pendant arms over the crown moiety fragment. The conformation where the pendant arm holding the imine group is placed above the macrocyclic chain containing two ether oxygen atoms has been denoted as I, whereas the term II refers to the conformation in which such pendant arm is placed above the macrocyclic chain containing the single oxygen atom. Compounds of formula [Pb(L(7))](ClO4)2 (1) and [Pb(L(8)-H)](ClO4) (2) were isolated and structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction analyses. The crystal structure of 1 adopts conformation I and shows the lead(II) ion bound to the eight available donor atoms of the bibracchial lariat ether in a holodirected geometry, whereas the geometry of 2 is best described as hemidirected, with the receptor adopting conformation II. The five systems [Pb(L(7))]2+, [Pb(L(8))]2+, [Pb(L(8)-H)]+, [Pb(L(9)-H)]+, and [Pb(L(10)-H)]+ were characterized by means of density functional theory calculations (DFT) performed by using the B3LYP model. An analysis of the natural bond orbitals (NBOs) indicates that the Pb(II) lone-pair orbital remains almost entirely s in character in the [Pb(L(7))]2+ complexes, whereas in [Pb(L(8)-H)]+, the Pb(II) lone pair is polarized by a certain 6p contribution. The reasons for the different roles of the Pb(II) lone pair in compounds 1 and 2 as well as in the related model compounds are discussed. Our results point to the presence of a charged donor atom in the ligand (such as a phenolate oxygen atom, pyrrolate nitrogen atom, or even thiophenolate sulfur atom) favoring hemidirected geometries.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Lone-Pair Activity in Lead(II) Complexes with Unsymmetrical Lariat Ethers

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is believed that relativistic effects will become important for the elements from the fourth row of the periodic table . This ECP has been demonstrated to provide reliable results for different Pb(II) coordination compounds. ,− For the L 2 complexes the four possible conformations shown in Figure were explored. The lowest energy geometries located for the complexes of L 2 , which were found to correspond to minima in the potential energy surface, are shown in Figure .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lead(II) Thiocyanate Complexes with Bibracchial Lariat Ethers: An X-ray and DFT Study

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Compounds of formula [Pb(L2)(NCS)2] (1) and [Pb(L4)(SCN)2] (2) (where L2 is the lariat crown ether N,N'-bis(3-aminobenzyl)-4,13-diaza-18-crown-6 and L4 is the Schiff-base lariat crown ether N,N'-bis(3-(salicylaldimino)benzyl)-4,13-diaza-18-crown-6) were isolated and structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction analyses. The X-ray crystal structures of both compounds show the metal ion coordinated to the six donor atoms of the crown moiety, leaving the corresponding pendant arms uncoordinated. The coordination sphere of lead(II) is completed by two thiocyanate groups that coordinate either through their nitrogen (1) or sulfur (2) atoms. The organic receptor adopts a syn conformation in 1, while in 2 it shows an anti conformation. To rationalize these unexpected different conformations of the L2 and L4 receptors in compounds 1 and 2, as well as the different binding modes found for the thiocyanate ligands, we have carried out theoretical calculations at the DFT (B3LYP) level. These calculations predict the syn conformation being the most stable in both 1 and 2 complexes. So, the anti conformation found for 2 in the solid state is tentatively attributed to the presence of intermolecular pi-pi interactions between phenol rings, for which the dihedral angle between the least-squares planes of both rings amounts to 2.6 degrees and the distance between the center of both rings is 3.766 A. On the other hand, the analysis of the electronic structure has revealed that the Pb-ligand bonds present highly ionic character in this family of compounds. They also suggest a greater transfer of electron density from the NCS- ligands when they coordinate through the less electronegative S atom. The Pb-SCN covalent bond formation mainly occurs due to an effective overlap of the occupied 3p z orbitals of the S atoms and the unoccupied 6p z AO of the Pb atom, while the Pb-NCS bonding interaction is primarily due to the overlap of the 6s and 7s AO of Pb with sp(1.10) hybrids of the N donor atoms. Our electronic structure calculations can rationalize the different coordination of the thiocyanate groups in compounds 1 and 2: the simultaneous formation of two Pb-SCN bonds is more favorable for S-Pb-S angles close to 180 degrees , for which the overlap between the occupied 3p z orbitals of the S atoms and the unoccupied 6 pz AO of the Pb atom is maximized.

show abstract

“…This ECP has been demonstrated to provide reliable results for different Pb(II) coordination compounds. [29][30][31] Compared to the all-electron basis sets, ECPs account for relativistic effects to some extent. It is believed that relativistic effects will become important for the elements from the fourth row of the periodic table.…”

Section: Solution Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

Zn(ii), Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) complexation with pyridinecarboxylate containing ligands

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Herein, we report the coordination properties towards Zn(ii), Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) of two hexadentate ligands containing pyridinecarboxylate groups with ethane-1,2-diamine (bcpe) or cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (bcpc) backbones. The X-ray crystal structures of [Zn(bcpe)], [Cd(bcpe)] and [Cd(bcpc)] show hexadentate binding of the ligand to the metal ions, with the coordination polyhedron being best described as a severely distorted octahedron. The X-ray crystal structure of the Pb(ii) analogue shows the presence of tetrameric structural units [Pb(4)(bcpe)(4)] in which the four Pb(ii) ions are bridged by carboxylate oxygen atoms. While in the Zn(ii) and Cd(ii) complexes the bcpe ligand adopts a twist-wrap (tw) conformation in which the ligand wraps around the metal ion by twisting the pyridyl units relative to each other, for the Pb(ii) complex a twist-fold (tf) conformation, where a slight twisting of the pyridyl units is accompanied by an overall folding of the two pyridine units relative to each other is observed. Theoretical calculations performed at the DFT (B3LYP) level on the [Pb(bcpe)] and [Pb(bcpc)] systems indicate that the tf conformation is more stable than the tw form both in the solid state and in aqueous solution. The analysis of the natural bond orbitals (NBOs) indicate that the Pb(ii) lone-pair is polarized by a substantial 6p contribution, which results in a hemi-directed coordination geometry around the metal ion. Potentiometric studies have been carried out to determine the protonation constants of the ligands and the stability constants of the complexes with Zn(ii), Cd(ii), Pb(ii) and Ca(ii). The replacement of the ethylene backbone of bcpe by a cyclohexylene ring causes a very important increase in the stability constant of the Pb(ii) complex (ca. 2.3 logK units), while this effect is less important for Cd(ii) (ca. 1.4 logK units). However, the introduction of the cyclohexylene ring does not substantially affect the stability of the Zn(ii) and Ca(ii) complexes. The ligand bcpc shows Pb/Ca and Cd/Ca selectivities [10(8.9) and 10(9.8), respectively] superior to those of extracting agents, such as EDTA, already used in Pb(ii) and Cd(ii) removal from contaminated water and soils.

show abstract

Synthesis, Kinetic Study and Molecular Orbital Investigation of Cadmium(II), Mercury(II) and Lead(II) Complexes with the Mixed Pendant‐Arm Macrocyclic Ligand 1,7‐Bis(carboxymethyl)‐4,10‐bis(1‐methylimidazol‐2‐ylmethyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane

Cited by 5 publications

References 60 publications

Lone-Pair Activity in Lead(II) Complexes with Unsymmetrical Lariat Ethers

Lone-Pair Activity in Lead(II) Complexes with Unsymmetrical Lariat Ethers

Lead(II) Thiocyanate Complexes with Bibracchial Lariat Ethers: An X-ray and DFT Study

Zn(ii), Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) complexation with pyridinecarboxylate containing ligands

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About