1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-9834(00)84360-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis gas conversion on carbon supported iron catalysts and the nature of deactivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(1 reference statement)
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[121][122][123][124] Unfortunately, the FT specific activity decreased with reducing iron crystallite size and iron metal loading in the Fe/C system. [121][122][123][124] Unfortunately, the FT specific activity decreased with reducing iron crystallite size and iron metal loading in the Fe/C system.…”
Section: Porous Nanocarbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[121][122][123][124] Unfortunately, the FT specific activity decreased with reducing iron crystallite size and iron metal loading in the Fe/C system. [121][122][123][124] Unfortunately, the FT specific activity decreased with reducing iron crystallite size and iron metal loading in the Fe/C system.…”
Section: Porous Nanocarbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some early investigations in the 1980s demonstrated that iron with high dispersion on porous carbon materials displayed moderate activity and relatively high stability at 100 kPa for the FT reaction. [121][122][123][124] Unfortunately, the FT specific activity decreased with reducing iron crystallite size and iron metal loading in the Fe/C system. [122,123] It is believed that the presence of micropores in the carbon support was responsible for the decrease in the activity of the FT catalyst.…”
Section: Porous Nanocarbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, weak interacting support (e.g. activated carbon) may exhibit rapid deactivation which can be due to iron sintering, formation of graphitic carbon, and other phenomena [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, 13, 14 Data on carbon deposition rates obtained under actual FTS conditions are relatively few and are mostly based on ex situ analysis of catalyst samples 10. 15 Obtaining in situ carbon deposition rates under FTS conditions poses a great practical challenge, as the use of a microbalance is usually restricted to atmospheric conditions 16…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%