2010
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201000664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Luminescent Properties of Noninterpenetrating (6,3) Type Network Lanthanide Metal–Organic Frameworks Assembled by a New Semirigid Bridging Ligand

Abstract: A series of lanthanide metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) possessing 4f homometallic 2D noninterpenetrating (6,3) honeycomb topological network structures with lanthanide atoms acting as three-connected centers have been assembled by using a semirigid bridging ligand with lanthanide nitrates, namely [{Ln 2 (NO 3 ) 6 L 3 }·(H 2 O) 2 ·(CHCl 3 )] n (Ln = Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Er; L = 2,5-dimethyl-1,4-bis[{(2Ј-benzylaminoformyl)phenoxy}methyl]benzene. The coordination layers are linked by intermolecular hydroge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compound 1 is excited at 275 nm, it exhibited characteristic emission bands for Tb 3+ centred at 490, 546, 586, and 622 nm, that belonging to the transitions of 5 D 4 → 7 F J ( J=6,5,4,3) (Figure b) . The 5 D 4 → 7 F 6 and 5 D 4 → 7 F 5 emissions result from an electric dipole transition and a magnetic dipole transition, respectively . The most intense emission is centered at 546 nm and corresponds to the hypersensitive 5 D 4 → 7 F 5 transition exhibiting a strong green luminescent emission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compound 1 is excited at 275 nm, it exhibited characteristic emission bands for Tb 3+ centred at 490, 546, 586, and 622 nm, that belonging to the transitions of 5 D 4 → 7 F J ( J=6,5,4,3) (Figure b) . The 5 D 4 → 7 F 6 and 5 D 4 → 7 F 5 emissions result from an electric dipole transition and a magnetic dipole transition, respectively . The most intense emission is centered at 546 nm and corresponds to the hypersensitive 5 D 4 → 7 F 5 transition exhibiting a strong green luminescent emission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emission spectrum of complex 1 displays the characteristic transitions of 5 D 0 → 7 F n (n = 1-4) at 590, 615, 650, and 699 nm, which can be explained on the basis of the Eu 3+ energy-level structure. [31][32][33][34] The fact that no emission peaks other than the characteristic emission peaks of Eu 3+ ions appear in the emission spectrum indicates that a ligand-to-europium energy transfer is inefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong stretching vibration transmittance bands at 1510 and 1384 cm −1 corresponded to free NO 3 − anions ( D 3 h ). However, no clear bands at 1280–1300 cm −1 belonging to coordinated NO 3 − ions ( V 4 ) were detected, indicating no NO 3 − anions coordinated to lanthanide ions groups . Compared to the ligand molecule thymidine, all the peaks in 1 H NMR spectra of Eu III /Tb III –T were broader due to the paramagnetic effect from the coordination interaction between thymidine and Eu III /Tb III ions (Figure D).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However,n oc learb ands at 1280-1300 cm À1 belonging to coordinated NO 3 À ions (V 4 )w ere detected,i ndicating no NO 3 À anions coordinated to lanthanide ions groups. [12] Compared to the ligand molecule thymidine, all the peaks in 1 HNMR spectra of Eu III /Tb III -T were broader due to the paramagnetic effect from the coordination interaction between thymidine and Eu III /Tb III ions ( Figure 3D). In addition, the chemicals hifts of the hydrogen atoms (at 4.9 and5 .2 ppm) in the Eu III /Tb III -T complexes were similart ot hymidine, suggesting that the hydroxylmethylene group on the furanose ring did not take part in the coordination of Eu III /Tb III cations.M oreover,w en oted that the signal of the hydrogen atom of the NÀHg roup sitting in between the carbonyl groups disappeared, in agreementw ith the FTIR data analysis; we proposed it might be due to the conversion of amide group into its isomer HOÀC=N-.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%