2018
DOI: 10.3390/cryst9010024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Crystal Structure, DFT Studies, Docking Studies, and Fluorescent Properties of 2-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2H-isoindole-1-carbonitrile

Abstract: 2-(Adamantan-1-yl)-2H-isoindole-1-carbonitrile (1) has been identified as a neurobiological fluorescent ligand that may be used to develop receptor and enzyme binding affinity assays. Compound 1 was synthesized using an optimized microwave irradiation reaction, and crystallized from ethanol. Crystallization occurred in the orthorhombic space group P212121 with unit cell parameters: a = 6.4487(12) Å, b = 13.648(3) Å, c = 16.571(3) Å, V = 1458(5) Å3, Z = 4. Density functional theory (DFT) (B3LYP/6-311++G (d,p)) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slight variation in the atomic radii and electronegativity of individual B, C, and N atoms resulted in the minimal deviation of average bond length and average bond angle. Though the deviation in the average bond length and bond angle of the optimized structure is minimum, the overall accuracy of the structural calculation can be verified by performing root mean squared deviation (RMSD) calculation 62 using PyMol 2.3.2 63 and is listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight variation in the atomic radii and electronegativity of individual B, C, and N atoms resulted in the minimal deviation of average bond length and average bond angle. Though the deviation in the average bond length and bond angle of the optimized structure is minimum, the overall accuracy of the structural calculation can be verified by performing root mean squared deviation (RMSD) calculation 62 using PyMol 2.3.2 63 and is listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 5UOW [9]). The methods used are similar to those originally reported by Joubert et al, 2018 and 2019 [27,28], with the exception of the protein used for the docking experiments. The Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2018 software suite [23] was used for docking studies with the following protocol: (i) the enzyme protein structure was checked for missing atoms, bonds, and contacts, (ii) removal of water molecules, 3D protonation and energy minimisation was done with parameters, force field: MMFF94X+solvation, gradient: 0.05, chiral constraint and current geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final DMSO concentrations were kept lower than 2%. A 100 μL solution of 0.55 mM NMDA/glycine solution was then added to selectively stimulate the opening of the NMDAR channel [1,2,27]. After incubation of 5 min at 37 °C the cellular suspension was centrifuged for 2 min using a desk Hermle Z 100 M ® Microfuge and the supernatant was discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crystal unit within the crystal structure of the 4 was selected as the starting structure for the DFT calculations. Structural optimization was performed using the Gaussian09 program package 31 , in the same manner as previously reported by our group 26 . Energy minima calculations were carried out using the Becke’s three parameters Lee-Yang-Parr exchange correlation functional (B3LYP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 4C7J). The docking method employed is similar to that reported by our group for studies on protease- and neuronal nitric oxide synthase enzymes 26,53 . The Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2018 software suite 41 was used for docking studies with the following protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%