“…The potential structural disorders may be one of the factors contributing to the high ionic conductivities of Na M OCl 4 , as previous studies have commonly observed that a less-ordered structure facilitates Na + movement in halide-based sodium ionic conductors. ,, The ionic conductivities of NaNbOCl 4 and NaTaOCl 4 are at least 2 orders of magnitude higher than those of pristine sodium metal chlorides (Figures c), such as Na 2 ZrCl 6 (∼1.8 × 10 –5 S m –1 ) and Na 3 M Cl 6 -type halides (e.g., ∼2.3 × 10 –8 S cm –1 for M = In, ∼1.0 × 10 –9 S cm –1 for M = Er), ,, except the highly amorphous NaTaCl 6 synthesized under extreme ball milling conditions (∼4 mS cm –1 ) . The values are also much higher than those of cation substituted sodium chlorides, for instance, Na 2.25 Zr 0.75 Y 0.25 Cl 6 and Na 2.4 Zr 0.6 Er 0.4 Cl 6 with ionic conductivities of 6.6 × 10 –5 and 3.5 × 10 –5 S cm –1 . , Just mixing halogen in sodium metal halides (e.g., Na 3 InCl 6– x Br x ) also cannot significantly enhance ionic conductivity . However, the O and Cl dual-anion systems beyond the pure halide system show ionic conductivities of over 1 mS cm –1 , not only NaNbOCl 4 and NaTaOCl 4 , but also 0.5Na 2 O 2 –TaCl 5 glass (4.6 mS cm –1 ), indicating the significance of extending composition systems of halide-based sodium ionic conductors.…”