2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization, DNA binding and cytotoxicity of fluoro-dipyrrin based arene ruthenium(II) complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…97 It is well-known that a DNA−intercalator complex stabilizes via van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic charge transfer, and electrostatic complementarities. 35,58,76,98,99 The most stable binding conformation of 1 and DNA revealed that it stacks in minor grooves via electrostatic interactions and the complex is adjusted in such a way that a part of the planar dipyrrin core makes the stacking interaction favorable with DNA base pairs and fits inside the DNA strands by van der Waals forces and hydrophobic contacts (Figures 10 and S14). 27,80 The resulting relative binding energies for docked structures of 1 and 2 have been found to be −285.75 and −277.11 eV, respectively, which indicates the better binding capability of 1 relative to 2.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…97 It is well-known that a DNA−intercalator complex stabilizes via van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic charge transfer, and electrostatic complementarities. 35,58,76,98,99 The most stable binding conformation of 1 and DNA revealed that it stacks in minor grooves via electrostatic interactions and the complex is adjusted in such a way that a part of the planar dipyrrin core makes the stacking interaction favorable with DNA base pairs and fits inside the DNA strands by van der Waals forces and hydrophobic contacts (Figures 10 and S14). 27,80 The resulting relative binding energies for docked structures of 1 and 2 have been found to be −285.75 and −277.11 eV, respectively, which indicates the better binding capability of 1 relative to 2.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the binding mode of the compounds with DNA, competitive binding studies have been carried out between EB (3,8-diamino-5-ethyl-6-phenylphenanthridine bromide) and 1 and 2 with CT-DNA. , EB is an intercalating weakly fluorescent labeling agent often used for staining nucleic acid and other biomolecules. ,, , After binding with DNA, its fluorescence intensity increases and displacement of EB (λ ex , 540 nm; λ em , 600 nm) from an EB–DNA complex by other compounds causes quenching of intrinsic fluorescence of the EB–DNA system. This occurs because of an increase in the concentration of free EB in solution and a lowering of the number of binding sites accessible for EB–DNA binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, dipyrrinato‐iridium and ‐ruthenium complexes show high potential for an application as chemotherapeutic agents. Specifically, ferrocene‐appended (dipyrrinato)(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)iridium(III) and (dipyrrinato)( p ‐cymene)ruthenium(II) complexes have been reported to exhibit an increased binding affinity to DNA [23c, 26] . Also, dipyrrinato complexes of zinc, ruthenium and gallium show promising potential for PDT [27]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of synthetic chemistry of transition metals, ruthenium is well developed and has attracted much attention as a building block for innovative new metalloid pharmaceuticals due to its low general toxicity, which contrasts with the pharmacological properties of platinum drugs. This low toxicity has been ascribed to selective uptake of ruthenium compounds by cancer cells mediated via the transferrin cycle and to mechanisms such as activation through reduction …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%