2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-5387(02)01413-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization, and structure of dinuclear copper(I) and silver(I) complexes of ortho-functionalized 1,3-bis(aryl)triazenide ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terminal Cu (3) atom is four coordinated by three nitrogen atoms from three triazenide ions. The Cu(3)-N distances fall in the range 1.951(4)-2.028 Å, which are similar to those found copper(II) triazenide 1.973-2.088 Å [27]. The mean central Cu (2) …”
Section: Structural Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The terminal Cu (3) atom is four coordinated by three nitrogen atoms from three triazenide ions. The Cu(3)-N distances fall in the range 1.951(4)-2.028 Å, which are similar to those found copper(II) triazenide 1.973-2.088 Å [27]. The mean central Cu (2) …”
Section: Structural Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The terminal Cu(1) is three coordinated by two nitrogen atoms from two L − ligands and one M-M bond, the Cu-N distances are 1.90(9) and 1.910(8) Å, which are shorter than those found in copper(II) triazenide 1.973 to 2.088 Å [19]. Another terminal Cu (3) silver(I) dimer [Ag(Ar-NNN-Ar)] 2 , the Ag-Ag distance is quite long (2.707(2) Å) [23]. This observation leads us to conclude that the triazenide ligands are not solely responsible for the M-M distances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite their ease of synthesis and tuning of the steric demand, the reactive N‐N‐N functionality of triazenes hampered their development in coordination chemistry. Three dimeric copper(I) triazenides [Cu(μ‐κ 2 ‐N(NAr) 2 )] 2 [Ar=Ph ( 1 ), 2‐MeO 2 CC 6 H 4 ( 2 ), 2,6‐ i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 ( 3 )] were structurally analyzed (Figure ) . The observed Cu–Cu distances of 1 (2.4405(10) Å), 2 (2.4289(12) Å), and 3 (2.4458(4) Å) were almost equivalent and independent of the bulk of the ligands.…”
Section: Intramolecular Cuprophilic Interactions In Cui Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%