2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization, and structural study of iron–sulfur core {Cp2Fe2(μ-SEt)2} complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two redox processes are well separated and the potential difference of E 1/2 Red1 – E 1/2 Red2 of 2a (BF 4 ) 2 (Δ E = 0.635 V) and of 2b (BF 4 ) 2 (Δ E = 0.592 V) are attributed to strong exchange interactions between the two iron centers 2a (BF 4 ) 2 and 2b (BF 4 ) 2 propagated through the orbitals of metal–metal bond and the bridged thiolate ligands. Similar electrochemical studies with related thiolate‐bridged CpFe complexes have led to the same conclusion (Table ) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The two redox processes are well separated and the potential difference of E 1/2 Red1 – E 1/2 Red2 of 2a (BF 4 ) 2 (Δ E = 0.635 V) and of 2b (BF 4 ) 2 (Δ E = 0.592 V) are attributed to strong exchange interactions between the two iron centers 2a (BF 4 ) 2 and 2b (BF 4 ) 2 propagated through the orbitals of metal–metal bond and the bridged thiolate ligands. Similar electrochemical studies with related thiolate‐bridged CpFe complexes have led to the same conclusion (Table ) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Complexes 2a (BF 4 ) 2 , 2b (BF 4 ) 2 , and 3a (BPh 4 ) 2 (BF 4 ) 2 all contain CpFe units with cis relative configurations bridged by two ethylthiolate ligands with the substituents adopting a syn orientation with respect to one another but anti with respect to the Cp ligands. The Fe–S distances in the structures of 2a (BF 4 ) 2 , 2b (BF 4 ) 2 , and 3a (BPh 4 ) 2 (BF 4 ) 2 fall in the range of 2.19–2.23 Å, values that are comparable to those of other thiolate‐bridged, Fe(III)‐containing diiron centered complexes …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Iron thiolate core complexes have significance because they are synthetic substances that mimick the redox behavior of active sites of metalloproteins, such as hydrogenase and ferredoxins. , Among synthetic iron thiolate complexes, dinuclear cyclopentadienyliron thiolate-bridged species are perhaps the most well-studied class from the perspective of their redox crystal structural properies. However, these substances have seldom been used as building blocks in the construction of supramolecular complex building units. In a recent effort aimed at expanding the range of supramolecular structural motifs of tetrametallic organometallic half-sandwich complexes and continuing studies of dinuclear cyclopentadienyliron thiolate-bridged complexes and isocyanide (CNR) coordination chemistry, we have investigated use of the iron thiolate core complex {Cp 2 Fe 2 (μ-SEt) 2 } as a syn-ligand-directed building unit for rectangular metallomacrocycle formation. Specifically, we felt that this substance would self-assemble with 1,4-diisocyanobenzene (1,4-CNC 6 H 4 NC), which is capable of serving as a bridging ligand between two metal centers, to form the coordination metallomacrocycles. Below, we describe the results of this study, which has resulted in the development of stepwise and direct self-assembly routes for construction of rectangular macrocyclic iron thiolate core complexes {Cp 2 Fe 2 (μ-SEt) 2 } bridged by 1,4-diisocyanobenzene ligands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%