“…The molecular structure of [2] showed a trigonal-bipyramidal coordination sphere for the indium ion, where the trigonal basal plane is formed by two sulfur atoms of the dianionic thiolate ligand, and the oxygen atom of the N,O-ß-heteroarylalkenolate ligand while the apical positions are occupied by the nitrogen atom present in the bridging amine group of the dianionic thiolate ligand and one nitrogen atoms of the heteroarylalkenolate ligand. The In-S bond distances (TableS1) in [1] were found to be in the range of 2.404(1)-2.676(2) Å, while the bond lengths of the bridging sulfur atoms in In1-S2 and In1_a-S2 were found to be longer at 2.485(1) Å and 2.676(2) Å respectively than the terminal In1-S1 bond length at 2.404(1) Å.These values correspond well with similar reported values of dimeric, trimeric and oligomeric organoindium compounds [33][34][35][36][37]. The In-N bond length (2.393(5) Å) and In-Cl bond length (2.415(1) Å) in [1] are both within the reported ranges 35,[38][39][40][41].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…These values correspond well to similar reported values of dimeric, trimeric and oligomeric organoindium compounds. [33][34][35][36][37] The In-N bond length (2.393(5) Å) and In-Cl bond length (2.415(1) Å) in [1] are both within the reported ranges. 35,[38][39][40][41] Notably, the three dependent indium sub-units in [1] and their corresponding atoms display uniform bond lengths and angles.…”
Section: Paper Dalton Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The In1–O1 bond length of 2.089(2) Å is notably shorter compared to those observed in complexes with higher coordination numbers, such as [(SOOS)In(py)(NO 3 )], [(SNNS)In(OAc)], [(NNS 2 )In(NO 3 )], [(NNS 2 )In(OAc)], and [(SNNSPr)In(OAc)] complexes with In–O bond lengths in the range of 2.162(4)–2.851(4) Å. 33 The equatorial positions of both compounds [1] (S2–In–S1) and [2] (S2–In1–S1) exhibited deviations from the ideal equatorial geometry of 120°, which are manifest in the distorted bond angles of 131.40(4) and [(127.98(3)°) (cal. 125.13°)], respectively.…”
Two new heteroleptic indium aminothiolate compounds [InClSC2H4N(Me)SC2H4]3 [1] and [InSC2H4N(Me)SC2H4(C8H5F3NO)] [2] were synthesized by in situ salt metathesis reaction involving indium trichloride, aminothiol, and N,O-ß-heteroarylalkenol ligands. The complexes were subsequently...
“…The molecular structure of [2] showed a trigonal-bipyramidal coordination sphere for the indium ion, where the trigonal basal plane is formed by two sulfur atoms of the dianionic thiolate ligand, and the oxygen atom of the N,O-ß-heteroarylalkenolate ligand while the apical positions are occupied by the nitrogen atom present in the bridging amine group of the dianionic thiolate ligand and one nitrogen atoms of the heteroarylalkenolate ligand. The In-S bond distances (TableS1) in [1] were found to be in the range of 2.404(1)-2.676(2) Å, while the bond lengths of the bridging sulfur atoms in In1-S2 and In1_a-S2 were found to be longer at 2.485(1) Å and 2.676(2) Å respectively than the terminal In1-S1 bond length at 2.404(1) Å.These values correspond well with similar reported values of dimeric, trimeric and oligomeric organoindium compounds [33][34][35][36][37]. The In-N bond length (2.393(5) Å) and In-Cl bond length (2.415(1) Å) in [1] are both within the reported ranges 35,[38][39][40][41].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…These values correspond well to similar reported values of dimeric, trimeric and oligomeric organoindium compounds. [33][34][35][36][37] The In-N bond length (2.393(5) Å) and In-Cl bond length (2.415(1) Å) in [1] are both within the reported ranges. 35,[38][39][40][41] Notably, the three dependent indium sub-units in [1] and their corresponding atoms display uniform bond lengths and angles.…”
Section: Paper Dalton Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The In1–O1 bond length of 2.089(2) Å is notably shorter compared to those observed in complexes with higher coordination numbers, such as [(SOOS)In(py)(NO 3 )], [(SNNS)In(OAc)], [(NNS 2 )In(NO 3 )], [(NNS 2 )In(OAc)], and [(SNNSPr)In(OAc)] complexes with In–O bond lengths in the range of 2.162(4)–2.851(4) Å. 33 The equatorial positions of both compounds [1] (S2–In–S1) and [2] (S2–In1–S1) exhibited deviations from the ideal equatorial geometry of 120°, which are manifest in the distorted bond angles of 131.40(4) and [(127.98(3)°) (cal. 125.13°)], respectively.…”
Two new heteroleptic indium aminothiolate compounds [InClSC2H4N(Me)SC2H4]3 [1] and [InSC2H4N(Me)SC2H4(C8H5F3NO)] [2] were synthesized by in situ salt metathesis reaction involving indium trichloride, aminothiol, and N,O-ß-heteroarylalkenol ligands. The complexes were subsequently...
Herein density functional theory (DFT) method was employed to explore the reaction mechanism of selective hydroboration of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds catalyzed by the metal-free complex, 1,3,2-diazaphospholene (DAP). The whole reaction...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.