2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, characterization and electrochemical investigations of heterocyclic-selenocarboxylate iron complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 depicts the reduction oxidation activity of each proposed solution at various scan rates (v) in the potential (V) range of − 0.80 to 0.0 V. In general, the cathodic peaks were not distinct in the four formulations, while anodic peaks were slightly observable. e recorded current peak (i p ) decreased as slower v was applied, which is in good agreement with previous reports [24,26,28,31]. is result could be explained by considering the size of diffusion layer around the electrode and the time required to observe it.…”
Section: Determination Of the Proper Conditions For Cyclic Voltammetrsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 2 depicts the reduction oxidation activity of each proposed solution at various scan rates (v) in the potential (V) range of − 0.80 to 0.0 V. In general, the cathodic peaks were not distinct in the four formulations, while anodic peaks were slightly observable. e recorded current peak (i p ) decreased as slower v was applied, which is in good agreement with previous reports [24,26,28,31]. is result could be explained by considering the size of diffusion layer around the electrode and the time required to observe it.…”
Section: Determination Of the Proper Conditions For Cyclic Voltammetrsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These bands are within the same range observed for alkyl or aryl thio-or selenosulfonato analogs. 18,19,[36][37][38] The C=C frequency of these complexes (1656, 1660 cm -1 ) is higher than the corresponding frequency of CpFe(CO) 2 SCOCH=CR 2 (1619-1622 cm -1 ) 45 and that for CpFe(CO) 2 SeCOCH=CR 2 (1637-1649 cm -1 ). 17 This difference may be attributed to more resonance between the C=O and C=C bonds in the latter complexes.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bands have been assigned relative to/in agreement with analogous reported systems. 17,18,25,26…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectra Of Complexes 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations