“…Furthermore, we also compared the SBET and Q o max of MG5 adsorption onto the biosorbents in this study with those of the other adsorbents in the previous literature (Table 8). Theses adsorbents comprised hydrochar (Tran et al, 2017g), biochar (Tran et al, 2017c), non-spherical activated carbon (Shiau and Pan, 2005;Tran et al, 2017b;Tran et al, 2017f), spherical activated carbon (Huang et al, 2014;Tran et al, 2017a), silver nanoparticles-loaded activated carbon (Ag-NP-AC) and zinc oxide nanorods-loaded activated carbon (ZnONR-AC) (Ghaedi et al, 2014), mesoporous zeolite (MCM-41) (Lee et al, 2007), glucose hydrochar modified with 1% triethylenetetramine (GH-TETA1%) and activated carbon modified with 1% triethylenetetramine (GAC1%) (Tran et al, 2017a), montmorillonite and activated clay (Shiau and Pan, 2005), titania nanotube (Lin et al, 2010). The difference on the Q o max values between these adsorbents might result from different primary adsorption mechanisms.…”