1One-pot hydrothermal procedure was used to synthesize high surface area M- 2 Co, Ni, Pd, Zn, and Sn) nanocatalysts. The M-MCM-41 catalysts containing 10wt% of different 3 metals were examined to evaluate the performance of individual metals in steam reforming of 4 methanol (SRM) in terms of activity, selectivity and long term stability under similar operating 5 conditions. The fresh and spent catalysts were characterized using BET, XRD, TGA-DSC, TEM, 6 TPR, ICP-OES, EDX, Raman, and FTIR analytical techniques. Cu-MCM-41 showed the best 7 performance in terms of activity and selectivity among the different catalysts investigated in this 8 study. The overall SRM reactivity trend for different metals based on methanol conversion 9 followed the order: Cu-MCM-41 > Pd-MCM-41 > Sn-MCM-41 > Ni-MCM-41 ≈ Zn-MCM-41 > 10 Co-MCM-41. The catalytic performance of Cu-MCM-41 at 250 °C using 1:3 methanol-water mole 11 ratios showed 100% H2 selectivity, ~6% CO, and no methane formation. The time-on-stream 12 studies conducted continuously for 40 h at 300 °C revealed that Cu-MCM-41 was the most stable 13 catalysts and displayed consistent steady state conversion (up to74%). The SRM activity of Pd, Sn 14 and Zn was comparatively better; however, they deactivated steadily with time. Although coking 15 was a major factor in deactivation of the catalysts, degradation of the mesoporous structure and 16 thermal sintering appeared to play an influential role in deactivation, particularly in the case of Sn-17 MCM-41. 18 Keywords: One-pot synthesis; metal-MCM-41 catalysts; steam reforming of methanol; catalyst 19 stability; Cu, Co, Ni, Pd, Zn, and Sn. 20 . 21 22 1. Introduction 1 Transition from non-replenishable fossil fuel energy to alternative clean energy such as 2 hydrogen is no longer an academic debate. Catalytic steam reforming of renewable alcohols (e.g. 3 methanol, glycerol and ethanol) is a highly favored route to produce hydrogen to generate 4 electricity, as well as, to power portable electronic gadgets and vehicles using fuel cell technology. 5 Traditionally, copper based catalysts supported on Al2O3, ZnO and ZrO2 have been studied and 6 used for commercial alcohol steam reforming processes [1-3]. Recently, Zhang et al. [4] showed 7 that Cu supported on three different supports (CeO2, ZrO2 and CeO2-ZrO2) exhibited significant 8 contrast in catalytic performance towards steam reforming of methanol. Hirunsit and 9 Faungnawakij demonstrated that Cu-based spinel-lattice catalysts possess high thermal stability 10 which suppresses Cu sintering at high reaction temperature [5]. In contrast, we and others [6-10] 11 have focused on the use of high surface area mesoporous supports (e.g. MCM-41, SBA-15, and 12 TiO2) for steam reforming, which tend to avail a high catalytic surface area with well defined large 13 pore sizes mitigating the catalyst deactivation (via sintering) by enhancing uniform dispersion of 14 the active metal particles. Recently, the versatility and robustness of these mesoporous silica 15 nanomaterials (MSNs) a...