2022
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202204899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Visualization of Entangled 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks with High‐Valency Stereoscopic Molecular Nodes for Gas Separation

Abstract: The structural diversity of three-dimensional (3D) covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are limited as there are only a few choices of building units with multiple symmetrically distributed connection sites. To date, 4 and 6-connected stereoscopic nodes with T d , D 3h , D 3d and C 3 symmetries have been mostly reported, delivering limited 3D topologies. We propose an efficient approach to expand the 3D COF repertoire by introducing a high-valency quadrangular prism (D 4h ) stereoscopic node with a connectivity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the C 2 H 2 /CO 2 uptake ratio of ca. 4 on the two COFs is much higher than that on other COFs, such as ZJUT-2 (1.7) and NKCOF-12 (1.4), and most MOFs, such as MUF-17 (1.2) and MAF-2 (3.7) . The separation selectivities of C 2 H 2 /CO 2 on NUS-71 and NUS-72 were estimated to be 16 and 6.7, respectively (Figure S21), which are much higher than those of COFs like ZJUT-3 (3.2) and 2D sql COF (4.8) but still lower than the benchmark MOFs for C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation, such as CPL-1-NH 2 (119) and MIL-160 (10) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the C 2 H 2 /CO 2 uptake ratio of ca. 4 on the two COFs is much higher than that on other COFs, such as ZJUT-2 (1.7) and NKCOF-12 (1.4), and most MOFs, such as MUF-17 (1.2) and MAF-2 (3.7) . The separation selectivities of C 2 H 2 /CO 2 on NUS-71 and NUS-72 were estimated to be 16 and 6.7, respectively (Figure S21), which are much higher than those of COFs like ZJUT-3 (3.2) and 2D sql COF (4.8) but still lower than the benchmark MOFs for C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation, such as CPL-1-NH 2 (119) and MIL-160 (10) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4 on the two COFs is much higher than that on other COFs, such as ZJUT-2 (1.7) and NKCOF-12 (1.4), and most MOFs, such as MUF-17 (1.2) and MAF-2 (3.7) . The separation selectivities of C 2 H 2 /CO 2 on NUS-71 and NUS-72 were estimated to be 16 and 6.7, respectively (Figure S21), which are much higher than those of COFs like ZJUT-3 (3.2) and 2D sql COF (4.8) but still lower than the benchmark MOFs for C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation, such as CPL-1-NH 2 (119) and MIL-160 (10) . The heats of adsorption ( Q st ) for C 2 H 2 were further calculated to be 32.7 and 30.1 kJ mol –1 on NUS-71 and NUS-72, respectively, which are higher than those for CO 2 (20.6 and 20.8 kJ mol –1 , respectively; Figure S26), indicative of the preferential sorption of C 2 H 2 over CO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…3D COFs still remain relatively less explored in comparison with their 2D analogues due to the still limited building blocks and difficulty in solving their more complicated structure . Thus far, only building blocks with 3D tetrahedral ( T d ), triangular prismatic ( D 3h ), and cubic ( O h ) , symmetry have been used to fabricate 3D COFs, leading to corresponding materials with extended topologies of ctn , bor , dia , ion , pts , ljh , rra , nbo , tbo , fjh , ffc , acs , ceq , hea , stp , srs , pcb , and bcu , far from their analogous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) . It is worth noting again that almost all of these 3D building blocks are of nonconjugated nature, resulting in the isolation of nonconjugated 3D COFs with relatively low conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, applying COFs for C 3 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation has not been reported yet. Compared with traditional 2D COFs, which usually possess large and noninterconnected pores, 3D COFs tend to possess more complex microporous structures, interconnected channels, and higher structural robustness and have more accessible active sites, which endow them with higher superiority for gas separation. In recent years, 3D COFs have attracted increasing interest in the construction of novel topologies and functionalities. ,, However, hindered by the limited building blocks and difficulty in structure determination, using 3D COFs for efficient gas separation is still in its infancy. ,, Thus, developing 3D COFs with tailored microporous structures and accessible active sites for gas separation, especially C 3 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation, is of great significance. To achieve such a goal, there are two feasible design approaches: (1) introducing the specific adsorption sites ,, and (2) forming appropriate pore apertures to enhance the interaction of gas molecules and frameworks …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%