2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of bismuth antimony telluride thermoelectric materials fabricated at various ball-milling speeds with yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic vessel and balls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of graphene addition, ZT was found to increase in the composite samples compared to pristine Bi 2 Te 2.7 Se 0.3 . Bi 0.3 Sb 1.7 Te 3.0, thermoelectric compound was fabricated using an yttrium vessel and stainless steel vessel by Mongkol et al 149 The mixture milled at 150 rpm with an yttrium vessel was found to have a higher ZT value than the compound milled in a stainless steel vessel by a factor of 1.7 at 500 K. The electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and thermal conductivity of the bismuth antimony telluride were 4.6 × 10 4 S/m, 295 µV/k, and 0.94 W/mK, respectively, at 500 K (Fig. 10a, b, c, and d).…”
Section: Thermoelectric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of graphene addition, ZT was found to increase in the composite samples compared to pristine Bi 2 Te 2.7 Se 0.3 . Bi 0.3 Sb 1.7 Te 3.0, thermoelectric compound was fabricated using an yttrium vessel and stainless steel vessel by Mongkol et al 149 The mixture milled at 150 rpm with an yttrium vessel was found to have a higher ZT value than the compound milled in a stainless steel vessel by a factor of 1.7 at 500 K. The electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and thermal conductivity of the bismuth antimony telluride were 4.6 × 10 4 S/m, 295 µV/k, and 0.94 W/mK, respectively, at 500 K (Fig. 10a, b, c, and d).…”
Section: Thermoelectric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used MA methods is that of the planetary ball milling (PBM) process [7][8][9][10][11], and it has significant advantages over other conventional methods (mixer mills, stirred mills, etc.). It is effective for wet and dry grinding processes due to the high mechanical stresses reached during the operation, and submicron and nanosized particles can be achieved with the proper milling balls and milling conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%