“…The relevance of ruthenium allenylidene complexes as key intermediates for propargylic substitution reactions has prompted many studies on the reactivity of allenylidene ligands attached to different ruthenium fragments. − Many of these studies have focused on the factors controlling the selectivity of the addition of nucleophiles to either the C α or C γ of the allenylidene ligand. − Thus, the electronic and steric properties of the metal fragment and the allenylidene substituents control the regioselectivity. On the other hand, whereas the α- and γ-carbons are electrophilic centers, the β-carbon exhibits a nucleophilic character, and protonation at this position leads to vinyl-carbyne species. , Our research group has broad experience with the chemistry of allenylidene complexes of ruthenium bearing monodentate, bidentate, and hemilabile phosphine ligands. ,, The electron richness of the metal center is tuned not only by the steric and electronic properties of the phosphine substituents but also by the nature of other supporting ligands such as hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate (Tp), , Cp, ,, Cp* ,, and indenyl . Thus, the fragments {[Cp*Ru(PR 3 ) 2 ] + } (PR 3 = PEt 3 , PMe i Pr 2 ) and {[Cp*Ru(dippe)] + } (dippe = 1,2-bis(diisopropylphosphino)ethane) are electron rich, and nucleophilic addition reactions to the allenylidene ligand take place at the γ-carbon, yielding vinylidene or alkynyl derivatives. , At variance with this, fragments such as {[Cp*Ru( i Pr 2 PNHPy) 2 ] + }, {[Cp*Ru(CO)(PMe i Pr 2 )] + }, {[CpRu(CO)(P i Pr 3 )] + }, and {[(η 6 -arene)Ru(PR 3 )] + } are more electron poor, and addition of nucleophiles to the allenylidene ligand occurs at the α-carbon, furnishing vinyl-carbene or σ-allenyl complexes.…”