Silicon nanowires (SiNWs) have been proposed as promising candidates for efficient solar energy conversion for at least three reasons: 1) the abundance of elemental Si and the rich knowledge of its electronic and photoelectronic properties, 2) the appeal of the nanowire morphology for improved charge collection, and 3) the widely available synthetic methods that can produce vertically aligned or randomly oriented high-quality SiNWs. [1][2][3][4][5] Despite intense efforts, however, the performance of SiNW-based solar cells remains significantly lower than what has been achieved for bulk Si or micrometer-scale wires. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The gap between the predicted performance and the inability to deliver raises an important question with regard to the origin of this problem. Owing to the similarity between the science of SiNWs and that of nanowires of many other compositions, finding answers to this question is of great importance to using these materials for efficient solar energy harvesting. [2,5] We performed a detailed study of SiNW electronic properties, which is aimed at understanding what limits the performance of SiNWs, by using electrochemical techniques. Our results reveal that the poor performance is not a result of the nanowire morphology, but is intrinsic to the growth chemistry. The finding suggests that more attention should be paid to the optimization of the synthesis of SiNWs in order to actualize the full potential of this exciting material for energy conversion purposes.Previous studies have shown that the high surface-tovolume ratio exhibited by SiNWs may be deleterious in reducing open circuit voltages. [1,16] This disadvantage can be partially compensated by gains in short-circuit current caused by the relaxation of charge diffusion distance requirements and improved light absorption; [1,7,14,[17][18][19] energy conversion efficiencies similar to that of bulk-Si-based devices are predicted. However, experimental efforts have failed to meet the expectation (Table 1), thus leaving important questions unanswered, such as whether the nanowire morphology is intrinsically disadvantaged and where research should be focused on.The first question we seek to answer experimentally is whether the nanowire morphology is intrinsically disadvantageous. We compared three types of samples: planar Si wafers, SiNWs prepared by electroless etching, [13,[20][21][22] and SiNWs synthesized by a bottom-up chemical method.[23] Derived from planar Si crystals, electroless etched (EE) SiNWs have the same crystallography and doping level as Si crystals from the bulk, they differ only in the surface-to-volume ratio. Studying EE SiNWs allows the collection of quantitative information on their performance and to relate this information to the nanowire morphology. An efficiency of 12.8 % (V oc : 563 mV; J sc : 33.5 mA cm À2 ; fill factor (FF): 68.0 %) was measured on planar Si with a doping level of 10 15 cm À3 , [24] which is in consistency with literature reports. [16,25,26] A slightly lower efficiency,...