2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.01.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and in vivo biodistribution of F-18 labeled 3-cis-, 3-trans-, 4-cis-, and 4-trans-fluorocyclohexane derivatives of WAY 100635

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of cis- and trans-[ 18 F]mefway BP ND values was approximately 15 when averaged across the cortical regions reported in Table 1. These differences in specific binding of cis- and trans-compounds follow those reported for cis- and trans- 4-[ 18 F]FCWAY and cis- and trans- 3-[ 18 F]FCWAY, with ratios in hippocampal specific binding between isomers of 5 (trans-/cis-), and 3 (trans-/cis-), respectively, based upon biodistribution studies at 30 minutes in rats[12]. By assuming that both cis- and trans-[ 18 F]mefway compounds target the identical receptor pool and have equal nonspecific binding in the brain, we can attribute this difference to the apparent (in vivo) equilibrium dissociation constant, K D .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio of cis- and trans-[ 18 F]mefway BP ND values was approximately 15 when averaged across the cortical regions reported in Table 1. These differences in specific binding of cis- and trans-compounds follow those reported for cis- and trans- 4-[ 18 F]FCWAY and cis- and trans- 3-[ 18 F]FCWAY, with ratios in hippocampal specific binding between isomers of 5 (trans-/cis-), and 3 (trans-/cis-), respectively, based upon biodistribution studies at 30 minutes in rats[12]. By assuming that both cis- and trans-[ 18 F]mefway compounds target the identical receptor pool and have equal nonspecific binding in the brain, we can attribute this difference to the apparent (in vivo) equilibrium dissociation constant, K D .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The conformation of trans- and cis- [ 18 F]FCWAY displayed a dramatic difference in 5-HT 1A binding with reported IC 50 values of 1.7nM and 21nM, respectively. In vivo PET measures revealed similar blood metabolic profiles, but hippocampus to cerebellum ratios were 19.3 and 3.6 for trans- and cis- [ 18 F]FCWAY respectively [6]. Preliminary in vitro measures have also been made for [ 18 F]mefway, which have indicated that the cis- isomer has lower affinity for the 5-HT 1A receptor than the trans- isomer [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unlabeled mefway used in these experiments was a commercially purchased reference standard consisting of an isomeric mixture of cis-and transmefway (15:85 (Wooten et al, 2011b). This profound difference in the binding affinity of isomeric pairs has been reported for other 5-HT 1A PET radiotracers (Lang et al, 1999;Wilson et al, 1999). In this work, the reported injected masses are based only on the measured trans-mefway mass and exclude the cis-mefway mass fraction.…”
Section: Considerations In Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Previous studies on a related analog, 18 F-FCWAY ([N-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazino]ethyl}-N-(2-pyridinyl)-4-[ 18 F]fluoro-cyclohexanecarboxamide) found changes in the position of the 18 F-radiolabel resulted in achange in the affinity of the compound (Ma et al 2006). Shifting the 18 F-radiolabel from the 4 position ( 18 F-FCWAY) to the 3 position ( 18 F-3-FCWAY) had the effect of lowered affinity,faster pharmacokinetics and lower defluorination, giving 18 F-3-FCWAY better characteristics for measuring dynamic change in 5-HT 1A receptors (Lang et al 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%