2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of lipophilic cation conjugated photosensitizers for targeting mitochondria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of them are increased in the case of BMPCP-4P 2 , but cellular uptake is smaller for TMPCP-4P than for TMPCP. These findings indicate that amphiphilic character is better for the cellular uptake (Ezzeddine et al 2013) but other factors like charge distribution (Rajaputra et al 2013) size and geometry of the compound could also influence the interactions with the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of them are increased in the case of BMPCP-4P 2 , but cellular uptake is smaller for TMPCP-4P than for TMPCP. These findings indicate that amphiphilic character is better for the cellular uptake (Ezzeddine et al 2013) but other factors like charge distribution (Rajaputra et al 2013) size and geometry of the compound could also influence the interactions with the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several authors showed before that the cellular uptake of cationic porphyrins varies with the number and distribution of positive charges, the size and the hydrophilic/lipophilic character of the compounds Rajaputra et al 2013;Ezzeddine 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three cationic conjugates were significantly more PDT-efficient in mouse colon cancer cells (Colon 26), because of improved cellular uptake in comparison to unconjugated CMP-OH, but, b a s e d o n f l u o r e s c e n c e m i c r o s c o p y, s e l e c t i v e mitochondria-targeting in human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) has been suggested only for CMP-Rh. A conjugate with two tPP groups was somewhat less efficient in targeting mitochondria, and the conjugate with only one tPP group was not evident in mitochondria, but both conjugates were more phototoxic than CMP-Rh, especially CMP-(tPP) which showed the highest cellular uptake (Rajaputra et al 2012). Surprisingly, mitochondrial localisation could not be proven for a series of derivatives of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis-(4-N-methylpyridyl)-porphine (TMPyP4), with alkyl chains of various lengths instead of a methyl group, despite bearing positive charges.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Targetingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[39][40][41][42] As the therapeutic effect only occurs at sites with the presence of both PSs and light irradiation, the side effects toward surrounding health tissues are minimized. However, due to the short lifetime (<0.04 µs) and limited radius of action (<0.02 µm) of singlet oxygen, [ 12,[43][44][45] the therapeutic effect of PDT is largely affected by the localization of PSs inside cells. Selective targeting toward the most critical subcellular organelles is therefore highly desirable to achieve high anticancer response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51][52][53][54] For example, porphyrin derivatives have been widely reported in mitochondria-targeted PDT. [ 12,52,55,56 ] However, due to the large hydrophobicity of most PSs, they naturally aggregate in aqueous media or when they are accumulated in mitochondria with limited spaces. The aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) effect of traditional PSs often leads to quenched fl uorescence as well as reduced ROS generation, [57][58][59] which largely compromised the effi ciencies of PDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%