1998
DOI: 10.1021/jm980233p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Evaluation of N-[11C]Methylated Analogues of Epibatidine as Tracers for Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

Abstract: Four halogen-substituted analogues of N-methylepibatidine, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) ligand, were synthesized. They were (+/-)-exo-N-methyl-2-(2-halogeno-5-pyridyl)-7-azabicyclo[2. 2.1]heptanes, where halogeno = F (1a), Cl (2a), Br (3a), I (4a). (+/-)-N-Ethylepibatidine (2b) also was synthesized. The compounds 1a, 2a, 3a, and 4a and their corresponding normethyl analogues 1, 2, 3, and 4 inhibited the in vitro binding of [3H]epibatidine to nAChRs to a similar degree, with affinities in the 27-5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(77 reference statements)
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been jpet.aspetjournals.org a problem with other epibatidine analogs. Halogen-substituted and methylated analogs of epibatidine have been reported to produce fewer toxicities in rodents (Badio et al, 1997;Horti et al, 1998); however, the reduction in toxic effects seen in these studies was not sufficient to ensure safe therapeutic/toxicity ratios. Epiboxidine, a methylisoxazole analog of epibatidine has also been reported to produce fewer toxicities than epibatidine in mice (Badio et al, 1997).…”
Section: Affinity and Efficacy Of Epibatidine Analogs 1249mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been jpet.aspetjournals.org a problem with other epibatidine analogs. Halogen-substituted and methylated analogs of epibatidine have been reported to produce fewer toxicities in rodents (Badio et al, 1997;Horti et al, 1998); however, the reduction in toxic effects seen in these studies was not sufficient to ensure safe therapeutic/toxicity ratios. Epiboxidine, a methylisoxazole analog of epibatidine has also been reported to produce fewer toxicities than epibatidine in mice (Badio et al, 1997).…”
Section: Affinity and Efficacy Of Epibatidine Analogs 1249mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Epibatidine is reported to exhibit high-potency analgesic activity with a longer duration of action than nicotine (Qian et al, 1993;Rogers and Iwamoto, 1993;Badio and Daly, 1994), and epibatidine analogs are currently under investigation as nonopioid analgesics. However, epibatidine is reported to produce various toxicities in rodents, including increased heart rate, motor incoordination, and seizure (Sullivan et al, 1994;Bonhaus et al, 1995;Horti et al, 1998). The toxicity of epibatidine may arise from its capacity to activate many different neuronal nAChR subtypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[75] Modifications on the basic nitrogen of 18 are not well tolerated: only N-methylation gives compounds with comparable affinity, whereas the N-ethyl analogue showed an affinity 500 times lower. [76] It is not surprising that compounds 21 showed much lower affinity than 18; however their K i values were still in the nanomolar range. [77] It is a pity that these compounds have been tested only as a mixture of isomers, and their functional activity has not been measured, as it is known that Nmethylation of 18 introduces some enantioselectivity in functional tests on a4b2, a3b4, and a7 receptors.…”
Section: Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to ␣4␤2 nAChRs, nAChRs containing ␣3 and ␤4 subunits, possibly in combination with ␣5 subunits, are distributed mostly in the peripheral nervous system and adrenal glands (Holladay et al, 1997). Therefore, high affinity for the latter receptors could contribute to the untoward cardiovascular effects of epibatidine and its analogs (Molina et al, 1997;Horti et al, 1998) and might limit the use of epibatidine-based compounds for imaging nAChRs in human subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%