2016
DOI: 10.2174/1570178614666161107142106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Evaluation of A Water-Soluble Epothilone B Prodrug with Remarkably Decreased Toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glutathione‐epothilone B ( 26 , IC 50 : 1.3 nM, MTT assay), the epothilone B prodrug, showed at least 4000 times higher solubility in water than epothilone B (21.1 vs. 0.005 mg/ml), which was more potent than epothilone B (IC 50 : 4.3 nM) against HepG2 cells. [ 70 ] The SAR proved that replacement of the 12,13‐epoxide with an aziridine moiety was favorable to the activity, and a significant part of the epothilone B analogues (IC 50 : 0.01–353.1 nM, MTT assay) was highly potent against SKBR3, SKOV3, HeLa, MDR MES SA DXE, and MES SA DX cancer cell lines, with IC 50 values in a nanomolar range. [ 71 ] In particular, the most active analogue 27 (IC 50 : 0.01–0.03 nM) was 94.3‐ to 9280‐fold more potent than epothilone B (IC 50 : 1.27–3.63 nM) and ixabepilone (IC 50 : 7.72 and 278.4 nM), so this compound warrants further investigations.…”
Section: ‐Membered Macrolactonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glutathione‐epothilone B ( 26 , IC 50 : 1.3 nM, MTT assay), the epothilone B prodrug, showed at least 4000 times higher solubility in water than epothilone B (21.1 vs. 0.005 mg/ml), which was more potent than epothilone B (IC 50 : 4.3 nM) against HepG2 cells. [ 70 ] The SAR proved that replacement of the 12,13‐epoxide with an aziridine moiety was favorable to the activity, and a significant part of the epothilone B analogues (IC 50 : 0.01–353.1 nM, MTT assay) was highly potent against SKBR3, SKOV3, HeLa, MDR MES SA DXE, and MES SA DX cancer cell lines, with IC 50 values in a nanomolar range. [ 71 ] In particular, the most active analogue 27 (IC 50 : 0.01–0.03 nM) was 94.3‐ to 9280‐fold more potent than epothilone B (IC 50 : 1.27–3.63 nM) and ixabepilone (IC 50 : 7.72 and 278.4 nM), so this compound warrants further investigations.…”
Section: ‐Membered Macrolactonesmentioning
confidence: 99%