2003
DOI: 10.1287/isre.14.4.337.24901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Decomposition of Processes in Organizations

Abstract: O rganizations today face increasing pressures to integrate their processes across disparate divisions and functional units, in order to remove inefficiencies as well as to enhance manageability. Process integration involves two major types of changes to process structure: (1) synthesizing processes from separate but interdependent subprocesses, and (2) decomposing aggregate processes into distinct subprocesses that are more manageable. We present an approach to facilitate this type of synthesis and decomposit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of such correspondences is a prerequisite for merging and integrating process models [54,55,56]. Inspired by techniques on schema and ontology matching [57], there has been a series of works discussing the specifics of aligning and comparing process models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of such correspondences is a prerequisite for merging and integrating process models [54,55,56]. Inspired by techniques on schema and ontology matching [57], there has been a series of works discussing the specifics of aligning and comparing process models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many firms are linked through electronic networks and software applications, as well as the merger of their business processes (Hammer, 2001, Straub and Watson, 2001, Mukhopadhyay and Kekre, 2002, Basu and Blanning, 2003. Thus, trading partners have an impact on the production of IT investment value (Clemons and Row, 1993, Bakos and Nault, 1997, Chatfield and Yetton, 2000.…”
Section: Partner Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These criteria are defined on activity properties such as execution cost, duration, frequency, and associated resources; activities are either abstracted or preserved depending on whether they meet the given criteria. Basu and Blanning [2] propose a technique for detecting possible abstractions by searching for structural patterns. We are not aware of BPMA algorithms and, in particular, activity aggregation algorithms, that use semantic information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%