2011
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201100032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of μ‐Oxido‐ and μ‐Hydroxido‐Bridged Dinuclear Iron(III) Complexes with an N2O Donor Ligand – A Theoretical Study on the Influence of Weak Forces on the Fe–O–Fe Bridging Angle

Abstract: The synthesis and crystal structures of three nonheme diiron(III) complexes with a tridentate N,N,O Schiff‐baseligand, 2‐({[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenol (HL), are reported. Complexes [Fe2OL2(NCO)2] (1a) and [Fe2OL2(SAL)2]·H2O [SAL = o‐(CHO)C6H4O–] (1b) are unsupported μ‐oxido‐bridged dimers, and [Fe2(OH)L2(HCOO)2(Cl)] (2) is a μ‐hydroxido‐bridged dimer supported by a formato bridging ligand. All complexes have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography and spectroscopic analysis. Complex 1b has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complex is a m-oxido-bridged dinuclear iron(III) complex, with Fe¢ ¢ ¢Fe separation of 3.467 (2) are within the range found for other m-oxido-bridged dinuclear iron complexes. [21][22][23] In addition, the Fe-O-Fe bond angle of 150.8 (1) in the complex is also similar to those observed in similar complexes with octahedral coordination, [21][22][23] but much smaller than the m-oxido-bridged dinuclear iron complexes with square pyramidal coordination. [24][25][26] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The complex is a m-oxido-bridged dinuclear iron(III) complex, with Fe¢ ¢ ¢Fe separation of 3.467 (2) are within the range found for other m-oxido-bridged dinuclear iron complexes. [21][22][23] In addition, the Fe-O-Fe bond angle of 150.8 (1) in the complex is also similar to those observed in similar complexes with octahedral coordination, [21][22][23] but much smaller than the m-oxido-bridged dinuclear iron complexes with square pyramidal coordination. [24][25][26] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In 2011 Gosh and coworkers reported a related compound, containing one bridging hydroxo and one bridging formate ligand, but in contrast to 6 the iron centers have the oxidation state +III. 18 All in all, complexes displaying a Fe( μ -OH)( μ -HCOO)Fe motif are rather rare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other purely O‐donor‐coordinated Fe III compounds have coordination numbers of four, based, for example, on sterically demanding O t Bu ligands 38,39. Pentacoordinate Fe III compounds are highly exciting compounds, as they are the main players in crucial applications such as oxygen transport in blood (non‐heme),35,40 enzymes,37 and catalysts 29–33. Complexes with coordination number five can process two different geometries, either square pyramidal or trigonal bipyramidal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%