Synthesis and Characterization of Three New Layered Vanadium Tellurites, MVTe2O8 (M = Al, Ga, and Mn): Three-Dimensional (3-D) Antiferromagnetic Behavior of MnVTe2O8 with a Zigzag S = 2 Spin Chain

Bae, Sung Jin; Yoo, Jinwoo; Lee, Suheon; Choi, K.-Y.; Ok, Kang Min

doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02784

Cited by 18 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the solid-state materials introduced here so far exhibit different structures and dimensionalities attributed to the various constituent building units such as distorted MO 6 octahedra and QO n (Q = Sb, Se, Te; n = 3–5) polyhedra with lone pairs. For example, the variable coordination environments of Te 4+ with oxide ligands can exhibit a variety of structural motifs such as trigonal pyramid, seesaw, and square pyramid. ,− Introducing other cations with flexibility such as p-block elements can generate further structural diversity. The presence of framework flexibility can often influence the backbone architecture as well as the space group symmetry.…”

Section: Effect Of Framework Flexibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward the Rational Design of Novel Noncentrosymmetric Materials: Factors Influencing the Framework Structures

2016

Acc. Chem. Res.

Self Cite

484

301

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid-state materials with extended structures have revealed many interesting structure-related characteristics. Among many, materials crystallizing in noncentrosymmetric (NCS) space groups have attracted massive attention attributable to a variety of superb functional properties such as ferroelectricity, pyroelectricity, piezoelectricity, and nonlinear optical (NLO) properties. In fact, the characteristics are pivotal to many industrial applications such as laser systems, optical communications, photolithography, energy harvesting, detectors, and memories. Thus, for the past several decades, a great deal of synthetic effort has been vigorously made to realize these technologically important properties by improving the occurrence of macroscopic NCS space groups. A bright approach to increase the incidence of NCS structures was combining local asymmetric units during the initial synthesis process. Although a significant improvement has been achieved in obtaining new NCS materials using this strategy, the majority of solid-state materials still crystallize in centrosymmetric (CS) structures as the locally unsymmetrical units are easily lined up in an antiparallel manner. Therefore, discovering an effective method to control the framework structure and the macroscopic symmetry is an imminent ongoing challenge. In order to more effectively control the overall symmetry of solid-state compounds, it is critical to understand how the backbone and the subsequent centricity are affected during the crystallization. In this Account, several factors influencing the framework structure and centricity of solid-state materials are described in order to more systematically discover novel NCS materials. Recent studies on crystalline solid-state materials suggest three factors affecting the local coordination environment as well as the overall symmetry of the framework structure: (1) size variations of the various template cations, (2) a variable backbone arrangement occurring from the hydrogen-bonding interactions, and (3) the presence of framework flexibility. With regard to the first factor, the impact of size of the various metal cations and coordination numbers on the alignment of other adjacent polyhedra, linkers, and lone pairs determining the framework geometries of mixed metal oxides is analyzed. The second factor considers the regulation of crystallographic centricity determined by the availability of hydrogen-bonding interactions between anionic frameworks containing local asymmetric polyhedra and organic cations. Finally, the third factor explores the framework architecture and the space group symmetry influenced by the flexibility of polyhedra revealing variable coordination numbers. The centricity and framework of new solid-state materials might be controlled by using a variety of synthetically controllable asymmetric units such as organic structure-directing cations and linkers with different sizes and functional groups.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Framework Flexibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward the Rational Design of Novel Noncentrosymmetric Materials: Factors Influencing the Framework Structures

2016

Acc. Chem. Res.

Self Cite

484

301

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The abundant structures of borates are deemed to be the major factor in their optical properties. For example, borates with 2D layered structures generally feature excellent optical properties, since the 2D layered structures are conducive to the generation of optical anisotropies. The famous crystal KBe 2 BO 3 F 2 (KBBF) exhibits the brilliant nonlinear optical properties due to its infinite planar [Be 2 BO 3 F 2 ] ∞ monolayer structure.…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

β‐CsB₉O₁₄: A Triple‐Layered Borate with Edge‐Sharing BO₄ Tetrahedra Exhibiting a Short Cutoff Edge and a Large Birefringence

Han

Huang

Tudi

et al. 2019

Chemistry A European J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The first triple-layered borate with edge-sharing BO 4 tetrahedra, b-CsB 9 O 14 was obtainedu nder vacuumsealed condition. It represents an ew structure type and enriches the structurald iversity of borates.M oreover, b-CsB 9 O 14 exhibits as hort UV cutoffe dge and al arge birefringence, indicating that it could be regardeda saDUV birefringentc rystal.Exploring new compounds with uniques tructures has attracted much interest of researchers, since these compounds not only enrich structural chemistry,but also may possess potential application in some areas. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Borates, especially,can be regarded as an excellent candidate to explore structure unique compounds due to various coordination pattern of B( BO 3 or BO 4 ) which may be polymerizedt of orm different fundamental buildingb locks (FBBs). Then the FBBs will furtherc onstruct isolated clusters, one-dimensional (1D) chains, 2D layers, or 3D networks. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The abundant structures of borates are deemed to be the major factor in their optical properties.F or example, borates with 2D layered structures generally feature excellent opticalp roperties, [3b, 19-23] since the 2D layered structures are conducive to the generation of optical anisotropies. The famousc rystal KBe 2 BO 3 F 2 (KBBF) exhibits the brilliant nonlinear opticalp roperties due to its infinite planar [Be 2 BO 3 F 2 ] 1 monolayer structure.B ased on the layereds tructure of KBBF,s everal new boratesi ncluding KZn 2 BO 3 Cl 2 ,B aBe 2 BO 3 F 3 ,e tc. [22a, 24, 25] were obtained through element substitution. In order to reinforce interlayer bonding, some borates with double-layered structures, which can be regarded as the polymerization of [a] Dr.Supporting information and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under: https://doi.

show abstract

“…Vanadium tellurites have been investigated extensively due to their rich structural chemistry and interesting physical properties, such as second harmonic generation (SHG) (Xiao et al, 2003;Hou et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2010;Glor et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011;Bae et al, 2016). Tellurites, i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Te 4+ O x , are often observed in various unusual structures attributable to the presence of stereo-active lone-pair electrons, which serve as structure-directing agents (Guesdon & Raveau, 2000;Halasyamani, 2004). In addition, the asym-metric coordination environment of Te 4+ O x (x = 3, 4, or 5) polyhedra may form various structural motifs, including isolated clusters, chains, layers, and three-dimensional networks (Guesdon & Raveau, 2000;Xiao et al, 2003;Hou et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2006;Kim & Halasyamani, 2008;Zhang et al, 2010;Glor et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011;Bae et al, 2016). Similarly, vanadates, i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, vanadates, i.e. V 5+ O x , show rich structural features because of their various coordination geometries, such as VO 4 tetrahedra, VO 5 square pyramids or trigonal bipyramids, and VO 6 octahedra (Xiao et al, 2003;Hou et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2010;Glor et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011;Bae et al, 2016). With respect to known alkaline-earth vanadium tellurites, only two strontium vanadium tellurites, namely Sr(V 2 O 5 )(TeO 3 ) (space group P1, No.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A new one-dimensional strontium vanadium tellurite, Sr₇V₄Te₁₂O₄₁

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vanadium tellurites display a rich structural chemistry with interesting physical properties, such as second harmonic generation (SHG). Tellurites, i.e. Te(4+)Ox, are often observed in unusual structures and form various structural motifs, including isolated clusters, chains, layers, and three-dimensional networks. Similarly, vanadates, i.e. V(5+)Ox, show rich structural features, such as VO4 tetrahedra, VO5 square pyramids or trigonal bipyramids, and VO6 octahedra. Strontium vanadium tellurite, Sr7V4Te12O41, was obtained from the melt of the solid-state reaction of SrTeO4 and VO2 in a sealed quartz tube as it cooled from 973 K. The crystal structure exhibits a one-dimensional latticework along the a axis comprised of paired Sr3Te3Ox units, namely Sr6Te6O2x+1, with corner-shared TeO4 polyhedra - and specifically the Te lone-pair electrons - facing outward in the bc plane. The Sr6Te6O2x+1 latticework is helical and is layered in the b-axis direction against sheets of corner-shared VO4 tetrahedra, and is linked in the c-axis direction via individual corner-shared SrO8 square prisms.

show abstract

Synthesis and Characterization of Three New Layered Vanadium Tellurites, MVTe₂O₈ (M = Al, Ga, and Mn): Three-Dimensional (3-D) Antiferromagnetic Behavior of MnVTe₂O₈ with a Zigzag S = 2 Spin Chain

Cited by 18 publications

References 39 publications

Toward the Rational Design of Novel Noncentrosymmetric Materials: Factors Influencing the Framework Structures

Toward the Rational Design of Novel Noncentrosymmetric Materials: Factors Influencing the Framework Structures

β‐CsB₉O₁₄: A Triple‐Layered Borate with Edge‐Sharing BO₄ Tetrahedra Exhibiting a Short Cutoff Edge and a Large Birefringence

A new one-dimensional strontium vanadium tellurite, Sr₇V₄Te₁₂O₄₁

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Synthesis and Characterization of Three New Layered Vanadium Tellurites, MVTe2O8 (M = Al, Ga, and Mn): Three-Dimensional (3-D) Antiferromagnetic Behavior of MnVTe2O8 with a Zigzag S = 2 Spin Chain

Cited by 18 publications

References 39 publications

Toward the Rational Design of Novel Noncentrosymmetric Materials: Factors Influencing the Framework Structures

Toward the Rational Design of Novel Noncentrosymmetric Materials: Factors Influencing the Framework Structures

β‐CsB9O14: A Triple‐Layered Borate with Edge‐Sharing BO4 Tetrahedra Exhibiting a Short Cutoff Edge and a Large Birefringence

A new one-dimensional strontium vanadium tellurite, Sr7V4Te12O41

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Synthesis and Characterization of Three New Layered Vanadium Tellurites, MVTe₂O₈ (M = Al, Ga, and Mn): Three-Dimensional (3-D) Antiferromagnetic Behavior of MnVTe₂O₈ with a Zigzag S = 2 Spin Chain

β‐CsB₉O₁₄: A Triple‐Layered Borate with Edge‐Sharing BO₄ Tetrahedra Exhibiting a Short Cutoff Edge and a Large Birefringence

A new one-dimensional strontium vanadium tellurite, Sr₇V₄Te₁₂O₄₁