2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of the unusual cluster [Ni2(GaAr′)2(η1:η1-μ2-C2H4)]: Ready addition of ethylene to Ni(COD)(GaAr′)2 at 25 °C and 1 atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structurally most interesting feature of 2 with respect to 1 is the toluene molecule coordinated to Ni2. The Ni–toluene centroid distance of 2 is 1.635 Å, which is rather similar to those other nickel(0) arene complexes found in the literature: [{(μ 2 -η 6 -IPr)Ni} 2 ] [IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene; Ni-[η 6 -C 6 H 3 ( i -Pr) 2 ] centroid = 1.607 Å], [C 3 H(CH 2 )(CH 3 )(C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) 2 )SiNi(η 6 -toluene)] [Ni–(η 6 -toluene) centroid = 1.592 Å], [(η 1 - t -Bu 2 PCH 2 P- t -Bu 2 )Ni(η 6 -benzene)] [Ni–(η 6 -benzene) centroid = 1.619 Å], [(R H 2 Si)Ni(η 6 -toluene)] [R H = 1,1,4,4-tetrakis(trimethylsilyl)butane-1,4-diyl; Ni–(η 6 -toluene) centroid = 1.618 Å], and [Ni 2 (GaAr′) 2 (η 1 :η 1 -μ 2 -C 2 H 4 )] [Ar′ = C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) 2 ; Ni–(η 6 -C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) centroid = 1.679 and 1.672 Å]. The Ni1–Zn and Zn–Zn distances in 2 are very similar to those of compound 1 , and likewise the trend for the Ni–Zn distances is Ni2–ZnMe bridging ≥ Ni1–ZnMe bridging > Ni1–ZnCp* > Ni1–ZnMe terminal .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structurally most interesting feature of 2 with respect to 1 is the toluene molecule coordinated to Ni2. The Ni–toluene centroid distance of 2 is 1.635 Å, which is rather similar to those other nickel(0) arene complexes found in the literature: [{(μ 2 -η 6 -IPr)Ni} 2 ] [IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene; Ni-[η 6 -C 6 H 3 ( i -Pr) 2 ] centroid = 1.607 Å], [C 3 H(CH 2 )(CH 3 )(C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) 2 )SiNi(η 6 -toluene)] [Ni–(η 6 -toluene) centroid = 1.592 Å], [(η 1 - t -Bu 2 PCH 2 P- t -Bu 2 )Ni(η 6 -benzene)] [Ni–(η 6 -benzene) centroid = 1.619 Å], [(R H 2 Si)Ni(η 6 -toluene)] [R H = 1,1,4,4-tetrakis(trimethylsilyl)butane-1,4-diyl; Ni–(η 6 -toluene) centroid = 1.618 Å], and [Ni 2 (GaAr′) 2 (η 1 :η 1 -μ 2 -C 2 H 4 )] [Ar′ = C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) 2 ; Ni–(η 6 -C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) centroid = 1.679 and 1.672 Å]. The Ni1–Zn and Zn–Zn distances in 2 are very similar to those of compound 1 , and likewise the trend for the Ni–Zn distances is Ni2–ZnMe bridging ≥ Ni1–ZnMe bridging > Ni1–ZnCp* > Ni1–ZnMe terminal .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Besides them, bis-arene structures like [Cr(η 6 -C 6 H 6 ) 2 ] and [U(η 8 -C 8 H 8 ) 2 ] , have been known for decades, but in contrast, zerovalent d 10 metal(η 6 -arene) complexes are still rare, which may arise from the electron-rich situation of the d 10 metal center, resulting in a low σ-donor/π-acceptor bonding efficiency and, thus, low thermal stability of these moieties. A few examples of such Ni(η 6 -arene) complexes that are stable enough to be characterized by single-crystal X-ray analysis have been reported: Mostly, strong σ donors are able to stabilize these highly reactive Ni 0 (η 6 -arene) complexes, including N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), ylides like silylene and phosphine, and low-valent Ga I Ar′ [Ar′ = C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 3 -2,6- i -Pr 2 ) 2 ] ligands. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational studies should be useful here. Complexes 02 (Figure a) to 06 (Figure b) have Ni(0)–Ni(0) bond lengths from 2.483 to 2.572 Å (Kubiak, , Fischer, and Seifert and Linti), while structure 07 has a shorter R MM value of 2.437 Å (Power).…”
Section: Nickel–nickel Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes them effectively group 13 carbene analogues. Complex 1 will donate its lone electron pair into empty orbitals of Lewis acids (Figure 56), resulting in complexes of type XCVI where M = boron, [177][178] aluminium, 178 gallium, 178 phosphorus, [179][180] nickel, 14,[181][182][183] platinum, 184 palladium, 184 copper, 185 silver, 185 germanium, 186 chromium, 187 molybdenum, 187 tungsten, 187 and cobalt. 187 While complex 1 can act as an ancillary ligand, it also readily undergoes redox chemistry to form complexes of type XCVII, and has been shown to insert into Au-Cl, 180 Rh-Cl , 188 Zn-Cl, 189 Zn-Me, 189 Ga-Cl, 190 Ga-Me, 190 Sn-Cl, [190][191] Si-Cl, 190 C-Cl , 190 Bi-O, 192 Bi-C, 130 Bi-N, 193 H-H, 194 O-H, [194][195] P-H, 194 P-P, 196 P-Cl, 193 N-H, 194 Sn-H, 194 Pb-Cl, 197 Pb-O, 197 Hg-S,…”
Section: Reactivity Of Gallium(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%