Diacylglycerides
(DAGs) constitute an important category of lipids
owing to their ability to form a lipid membrane, which can be used
in a wide variety of biomedical applications. DAGs often include a
zwitterionic polar headgroup that can influence the properties of
the lipid membrane (e.g., protein adsorption, ion binding, hydration,
membrane fluidity, phase stability) and affect their applicability.
To clarify the effect of the charge arrangement of zwitterionic headgroups
on intermolecular interactions in the DAG bilayers, we investigated
the intermolecular interaction between a naturally occurring DAG (1,2-dipalmitoyl-
sn
-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC)) and synthetic DAGs (which
is called “inverse charge zwitterlipids (ICZLs)”) whose
headgroup charges were antiparallel with respect to those of DPPC.
We used 1,2-dipalmitoyl-
sn
-glycero-3-carboxybetaine
(DPCB) and 1,2-dipalmitoyl-
sn
-glycero-3-sulfobetaine
(DPSB) as ICZLs and compared two combinations of the lipids (DPPC–DPCB
and DPPC–DPSB). We obtained surface pressure–area (π–
A
) isotherms to elucidate the intermolecular interaction
between the lipids in the monolayer at the air/water interface. We
found shrinkage of the area per molecule in both lipid combinations,
indicating that mixing DPPC with ICZLs results in an attractive intermolecular
force. As an overall trend, the degree of shrinkage of the mixed monolayer
and the thermodynamic favorability of mixing were greater in the DPPC–DPCB
combination than in the DPPC–DPSB combination. These trends
were also observed in the lipid bilayers, as determined from the gel-to-liquid
crystal phase transition temperature (
T
c
) of the aqueous dispersion of the lipid vesicles. In the highly
compressed lipid monolayers and vesicles (lipid bilayer), the molar
fractions of ICZLs, in which the intermolecular interaction reached
a maximum, were 0.6–0.8 for the DPPC–DPCB combination
and 0.5 (equimolar composition) for the DPPC–DPSB combination.
Therefore, in the compressed monolayers and bilayers, the mechanism
of intermolecular interaction between DPPC and DPCB is different from
that between DPPC and DPSB.