2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-021-02244-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of Ag-ZnO nano-composites for investigation of variations in the germination of peanut and kidney beans

Abstract: In this study, the effects of Ag-ZnO nano-composites (NCs) on the germination of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) have been investigated. Two synthesis techniques have been utilized including green Synthesis and sol-gel method to compare their effect on germination of both types of beans. Various inquring approaches including XRD, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), EDX and UV-vis spectroscopy were employed to characterize the synthesized Ag-ZnO NCs. The XRD pattern showed that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated scavenging percentage of BMG, commercial ZnO (C.ZnO), free synthetic ZnO (S.ZnO), and Co-ZnO for NIR were 22.2 ± 1.3%, 35.7 ± 1.5%, 36.8 ± 1.4%, and 54.7 ± 1.7%, respectively (Figure 5A). Therefore, the cobalt doping process increased the scavenging activity of S. ZnO by approximately 17.9%, which is 19% higher than that of C. ZnO and matches the previously reported results in the literature (Figure 5A) [25,47]. This was attributed to the reported surface electrons of the Co-ZnO nanoparticles, which effectively pair with the lone pairs of hydroxyl radicals [26,47].…”
Section: Nitric Oxide Scavengingsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated scavenging percentage of BMG, commercial ZnO (C.ZnO), free synthetic ZnO (S.ZnO), and Co-ZnO for NIR were 22.2 ± 1.3%, 35.7 ± 1.5%, 36.8 ± 1.4%, and 54.7 ± 1.7%, respectively (Figure 5A). Therefore, the cobalt doping process increased the scavenging activity of S. ZnO by approximately 17.9%, which is 19% higher than that of C. ZnO and matches the previously reported results in the literature (Figure 5A) [25,47]. This was attributed to the reported surface electrons of the Co-ZnO nanoparticles, which effectively pair with the lone pairs of hydroxyl radicals [26,47].…”
Section: Nitric Oxide Scavengingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Surface functionalization and hybridization of synthetic ZnO using different chemical and physical methods have been reported to be highly effective techniques for enhancing its bioactivity, biocompatibility, antibacterial activity, genotoxicity, and antioxidant properties [15,18,23]. The commonly used modification techniques involve (1) doping synthetic ZnO with other transition metals, (2) loading ZnO into an effective carrier or substrate, (3) incorporating synthetic ZnO into biocompatible biopolymers in composites, and (4) synthesizing chemical complexes of ZnO and bioactive phytochemicals [14,19,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface modifications and hybridization of the synthetic ZnO particles by the different physical and chemical methods were suggested as enhancement techniques for their biocompatibility, biological activity, and genotoxicity in addition to their antibacterial and antioxidant properties [15,18,26]. The commonly used modification techniques are: (1) elemental doping of ZnO crystal structure, (2) integrating the ZnO particles in composites with other metal oxides, (3) supporting the synthetic ZnO particles into effective carriers or substrates, (4) integrating the synthetic ZnO particles in composites with biologically active biopolymers, and (5) synthesis of the ZnO grains in chemical complexes with the known active phytochemicals from the extracts of the plants [14,20,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%