“…Specifically, the partial transformation of Macro-MIL-88A to Macro-Fe 3 O 4 -C-300 (characterized by its partially hydrophilic nature) preserved the structural scaffold, enabling higher loading compared to other supports, as evidenced by prior research. 27,61,62 Conversely, Macro-Fe 3 O 4 -C-500 due to marginally less 3D skeletal degradation compared to Macro-Fe 3 O 4 -C-300, yet retained significantly greater stability than Macro-Fe 3 O 4 -C-700, led to a moderate loading capacity. Besides, previously synthesized macroporous carbon derived from macroporous ZIF-8 exhibited a lower loading efficiency 5,9 compared to Macro-Fe 3 O 4 -C-500.…”